Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21113000›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2010

Disrupting vagal feedback affects birdsong motor control.

Jorge M Méndez, Analía G Dall'asén, Franz Goller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Motor origin of precise synaptic inputs onto forebrain neurons driving a skilled behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Vocal learning is constrained by the statistics of sensorimotor experience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  8. Afferents from vocal motor and respiratory effectors are recruited during vocal production in juvenile songbirds.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jorge M MéndezDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Analía G Dall'asén
Franz Goller

Funding

NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL AND MOTOR INTEGRATION OF BIRDSONGR01DC004390 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GOLLER, FRANZ · 2000 to 2009
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC 04390NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordination of different motor systems for sound production involves the use of feedback mechanisms. Song production in oscines is a well-established animal model for studying learned vocal behavior. Whereas the online use of auditory feedback has been studied in the songbird model, very little is known about the role of other feedback mechanisms. Auditory feedback is required for the maintenance of stereotyped adult song. In addition, the use of somatosensory feedback to maintain pressure during song has been demonstrated with experimentally induced fluctuations in air sac pressure. Feedback information mediating this response is thought to be routed to the central nervous system via afferent fibers of the vagus nerve. Here, we tested the effects of unilateral vagotomy on the peripheral motor patterns of song production and the acoustic features. Unilateral vagotomy caused a variety of disruptions and alterations to the respiratory pattern of song, some of which affected the acoustic structure of vocalizations. These changes were most pronounced a few days after nerve resection and varied between individuals. In the most extreme cases, the motor gestures of respiration were so severely disrupted that individual song syllables or the song motif were atypically terminated. Acoustic changes also suggest altered use of the two sound generators and upper vocal tract filtering, indicating that the disruption of vagal feedback caused changes to the motor program of all motor systems involved in song production and modification. This evidence for the use of vagal feedback by the song system with disruption of song during the first days after nerve cut provides a contrast to the longer-term effects of auditory feedback disruption. It suggests a significant role for somatosensory feedback that differs from that of auditory feedback.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryAcousticsAir SacsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysFinchesMaleRespirationVagus NerveVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID21113000
PMCPMC2992464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.