ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2010
Disrupting vagal feedback affects birdsong motor control.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preparing to sing: respiratory patterns underlying motor readiness for song.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Sensory feedback independent pre-song vocalizations correlate with time to song initiation.The Journal of experimental biology · 2019Article
- Breathtaking Songs: Coordinating the Neural Circuits for Breathing and Singing.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Review
- Motor origin of precise synaptic inputs onto forebrain neurons driving a skilled behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- The respiratory-vocal system of songbirds: anatomy, physiology, and neural control.Progress in brain research · 2014Review
- Characterization of respiratory neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, an area critical for vocal production in songbirds.Journal of neurophysiology · 2013Article
- Vocal learning is constrained by the statistics of sensorimotor experience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Article
- Afferents from vocal motor and respiratory effectors are recruited during vocal production in juvenile songbirds.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012Article
- Breathing and vocal control: the respiratory system as both a driver and a target of telencephalic vocal motor circuits in songbirds.Experimental physiology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coordination of different motor systems for sound production involves the use of feedback mechanisms. Song production in oscines is a well-established animal model for studying learned vocal behavior. Whereas the online use of auditory feedback has been studied in the songbird model, very little is known about the role of other feedback mechanisms. Auditory feedback is required for the maintenance of stereotyped adult song. In addition, the use of somatosensory feedback to maintain pressure during song has been demonstrated with experimentally induced fluctuations in air sac pressure. Feedback information mediating this response is thought to be routed to the central nervous system via afferent fibers of the vagus nerve. Here, we tested the effects of unilateral vagotomy on the peripheral motor patterns of song production and the acoustic features. Unilateral vagotomy caused a variety of disruptions and alterations to the respiratory pattern of song, some of which affected the acoustic structure of vocalizations. These changes were most pronounced a few days after nerve resection and varied between individuals. In the most extreme cases, the motor gestures of respiration were so severely disrupted that individual song syllables or the song motif were atypically terminated. Acoustic changes also suggest altered use of the two sound generators and upper vocal tract filtering, indicating that the disruption of vagal feedback caused changes to the motor program of all motor systems involved in song production and modification. This evidence for the use of vagal feedback by the song system with disruption of song during the first days after nerve cut provides a contrast to the longer-term effects of auditory feedback disruption. It suggests a significant role for somatosensory feedback that differs from that of auditory feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.