ArticleBiophysical journal2010
Distinguishable populations report on the interactions of single DNA molecules with solid-state nanopores.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamics of DNA Clogging in Hafnium Oxide Nanopores.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- Rational design of DNA nanostructures for single molecule biosensing.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Translocation frequency of double-stranded DNA through a solid-state nanopore.Physical review. E · 2016Article
- Smooth DNA transport through a narrowed pore geometry.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Detecting the translocation of DNA through a nanopore using graphene nanoribbons.Nature nanotechnology · 2013Article
- Threading immobilized DNA molecules through a solid-state nanopore at >100 μs per base rate.ACS nano · 2013Article
- Tracking single-particle dynamics via combined optical and electrical sensing.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Slowing down DNA translocation through a nanopore in lithium chloride.Nano letters · 2012Article
- Unzipping of Double-stranded DNA in Engineered α-Hemolysin Pores.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid-state nanopores have received increasing interest over recent years because of their potential for genomic screening and sequencing. In particular, small nanopores (2-5 nm in diameter) allow the detection of local structure along biological molecules, such as proteins bound to DNA or possibly the secondary structure of RNA molecules. In a typical experiment, individual molecules are translocated through a single nanopore, thereby causing a small deviation in the ionic conductance. A correct interpretation of these conductance changes is essential for our understanding of the process of translocation, and for further sophistication of this technique. Here, we present translocation measurements of double-stranded DNA through nanopores down to the diameter of the DNA itself (1.8-7 nm at the narrowest constriction). In contrast to previous findings on such small nanopores, we find that single molecules interacting with these pores can cause three distinct levels of conductance blockades. We attribute the smallest conductance blockades to molecules that briefly skim the nanopore entrance without translocating, the intermediate level of conductance blockade to regular head-to-tail translocations, and the largest conductance blockades to obstruction of the nanopore entrance by one or multiple (duplex) DNA strands. Our measurements are an important step toward understanding the conductance blockade of biomolecules in such small nanopores, which will be essential for future applications involving solid-state nanopores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.