Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21112173›Full record

Trial reportPatient education and counseling2011

Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD.

Celette Sugg Skinner, Adam Buchanan, Victoria Champion, Patrick Monahan, Susan Rawl, Jeffrey Springston, Zhao Qianqian, Sara Bourff

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparative effectiveness of two interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among females living in the rural Midwest.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Mammography Adherence in African-American Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2016
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Celette Sugg SkinnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9066, USA. celette.skinner@utsouthwestern.edu
Adam Buchanan
Victoria Champion
Patrick Monahan
Susan Rawl
Jeffrey Springston
Zhao Qianqian
Sara Bourff
Indiana University · USDuke Medical Center · USIndiana University School of MedicineSouthwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Promoting Breast Cancer Screening Via Computer V PhoneR01NR008434 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2004 to 2008
$2.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTailored, interactive mammography-promotion interventions can increase adherence if women are exposed to and find them usable. We compare exposure to and usability of interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD.

methodsProcess evaluation measures from 926 women randomly assigned to telephone or DVD intervention and completing post-intervention surveys.

results∼83% of each group reported exposure to all content. Partial exposure was higher for DVD (9% vs. 0.4%; p<.01); no exposure was higher for phone (15% vs. 8%; p<.01). There were no differences in exposure by age or race. Full phone exposure was less likely for women who already made mammography appointments. Usability rating was higher for DVD (p<.05), driven by ratings of understandability and length. Usability of both interventions was correlated with lower baseline barriers, and higher fear, benefits, and self efficacy. Higher ratings for phone were associated with lower knowledge and contemplating mammography. Non-whites rated DVD better than whites.

conclusionBoth tailored interactive interventions had wide reach and favorable ratings, but DVD recipients had greatest exposure to at least partial content and more favorable ratings, especially among non-white women. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This first evaluation of a tailored, interactive DVD provides promise for its use in mammography promotion.

Indexed as

MammographyPatient ComplianceProcess Assessment, Health CareTelephoneVideodisc RecordingAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21112173
PMCPMC3136570
OpenAlexW2016056761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.