ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2011
Role of porosity in tuning the response range of microsphere-based glucose sensors.
Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative investigation of binary and ternary hybrid nanocomposites synthesized from a nanoporous organic matrix.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Implantable nanosensors: toward continuous physiologic monitoring.Analytical chemistry · 2014Review
- Overview of fluorescence glucose sensing: a technology with a bright future.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Luminescent microspheres encapsulating glucose oxidase have recently been developed as implantable glucose sensors. Previous work has shown that the response range and sensitivity can be tuned by varying the thickness and composition of transport-controlling nanofilm coatings. Nevertheless, the linear response range of these sensors falls significantly below the desired clinical range for in vivo monitoring. We report here an alternative means of tuning the response range by adjusting microsphere porosity. A reaction-diffusion model was first used to evaluate whether increased porosity would be expected to extend the response range by decreasing the flux of glucose relative to oxygen. Sensors exhibiting linear response (R(2)>0.90) up to 600 mg/dL were then experimentally demonstrated by using amine-functionalized mesoporous silica microspheres and polyelectrolyte nanofilm coatings. The model was then used for sensor design, which led to the prediction that sensors constructed from ∼12 μm microspheres having an effective porosity between 0.005 and 0.01 and ∼65 nm transport-limiting coatings would respond over the entire physiological glucose range (up to 600 mg/dL) with maximized sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.