Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21110703›Full record

SynthesisActa orthopaedica2010

The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?

Kim E Wamper, Inger N Sierevelt, Rudolf W Poolman, Mohit Bhandari, Daniël Haverkamp

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta orthopaedica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075461 (Is arthroplaSty bEtter Than interNal Fixation in the undiSplaced Femoral nEck Fracture? A National Pragmatical Randomized Controlled Trial - the SENSE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 104 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075461 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Is arthroplaSty bEtter Than interNal Fixation in the undiSplaced Femoral nEck Fracture? A National Pragmatical Randomized Controlled Trial - the SENSE Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2020 to 2025Enrolled330ConditionsUndisplaced Fracture, Femoral Neck Fractures, Internal Fixation, ComplicationsArmsArthroplasty, Internal fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Instruments to assess patients with rotator cuff pathology: a systematic review of measurement properties.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2012
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim E WamperDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Inger N Sierevelt
Rudolf W Poolman
Mohit Bhandari
Daniël Haverkamp
Academic Medical Center · NLMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe Harris hip score (HHS), a disease-specific health status scale that is frequently used to measure the outcome of total hip arthroplasty, has never been validated properly. A questionnaire is suitable only when all 5 psychometric properties are of sufficient quality. We questioned the usefulness of the HHS by investigating its content validity.

methodsWe performed a systematic review based on a literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for descriptive studies published in 2007. 54 studies (59 patient groups) met our criteria and were included in the data analysis. To determine the content validity, we calculated the ceiling effect (percentage) for each separate study and we pooled data to measure the weighted mean. A subanalysis of indications for THA was performed to differentiate the populations for which the HHS would be suitable and for which it would not. A ceiling effect of 15% or less was considered to be acceptable.

resultsOver half the studies (31/59) revealed unacceptable ceiling effects. Pooled data across the studies included (n = 6,667 patients) suggested ceiling effects of 20% (95%CI: 18-22). Ceiling effects were greater (32%, 95%CI:12-52) in those patients undergoing hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

interpretationAlthough the Harris hip score is widely used in arthroplasty research on outcomes, ceiling effects are common and these severely limit its validity in this field of research.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHealth StatusEvidence-Based MedicineHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychometricsQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21110703
PMCPMC3216080
OpenAlexW2144762457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.