Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21110346›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2011

Function and evolution of sex determination mechanisms, genes and pathways in insects.

Tanja Gempe, Martin Beye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Roles ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In Vitro Comparison of Sex-Specific Splicing Efficiencies ofJournal of developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Theme and variation in the evolution of insect sex determination.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Silencing RNAs expressed from W-linkedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Cells · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tanja GempeDepartment of Genetics, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Universitaetsstrasse 1, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Martin Beye

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals have evolved a bewildering diversity of mechanisms to determine the two sexes. Studies of sex determination genes--their history and function--in non-model insects and Drosophila have allowed us to begin to understand the generation of sex determination diversity. One common theme from these studies is that evolved mechanisms produce activities in either males or females to control a shared gene switch that regulates sexual development. Only a few small-scale changes in existing and duplicated genes are sufficient to generate large differences in sex determination systems. This review summarises recent findings in insects, surveys evidence of how and why sex determination mechanisms can change rapidly and suggests fruitful areas of future research.

Indexed as

InsectaSex Determination ProcessesSex DifferentiationAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleGenesGenetic VariationMaleModels, AnimalMutationSex CharacteristicsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21110346
PMCPMC3040292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.