ArticleWorld journal of urology2011
Five-year cost analysis of intra-detrusor injection of botulinum toxin type A and augmentation cystoplasty for refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity.
Article in World journal of urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protocol-driven botulinum toxin injections for pediatric neurogenic bladder: long-term continence and bladder outcomes supporting its role as a minimally invasive alternative to augmentation cystoplasty.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Review
- The Comparative Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin-A Injection Therapy Versus Augmentation Uretero-Enterocystoplasty for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction.International neurourology journal · 2023Article
- The Current Positioning of Augmentation Enterocystoplasty in the Treatment for Neurogenic Bladder.International neurourology journal · 2020Article
- Botulinum toxin therapy for neurogenic detrusor hyperactivity versus augmentation enterocystoplasty: impact on the quality of life of patients with SCI.Spinal cord · 2016Article
- A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices.Central European journal of urology · 2014Review
- A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: Pharmaceuticals.Central European journal of urology · 2014Review
- Augmentation cystoplasty: Contemporary indications, techniques and complications.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2013Article
- Botulinum toxin-what urologic uses does the data support?Current urology reports · 2013Review
- Sustained effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder syndrome: 2-year follow-up of positive responders.International urogynecology journal · 2013Article
- Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion for neurogenic LUTS: current indications.Current urology reports · 2012Article
- Neurogenic bladder.Advances in urology · 2012Article
- Update on the management of overactive bladder.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTreatment options for antimuscarinic refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) are botulinum toxin type A injections (BTX-A) and augmentation cystoplasty (AC). We estimated initial and cumulative 5-year costs of these treatments. MATERIALS AND
methodsBase case is an individual with antimuscarinic refractory NDO and decreased bladder compliance. Primary analysis is from the health care payor perspective. Model probabilities and ranges were derived from literature and chart review. Reimbursements were derived from the average of insurance carriers. Complication cost calculations were based on standard practice. Decision-analysis model was made with TreeAge Pro Healthcare 2009 Software, Inc. and rolled back for cost calculation. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed on all variables, and two-way sensitivity analyses were based on these results.
resultsAverage reimbursement for one BTX-A injection and AC was $2,946.83 and $25,041.53, respectively. BTX-A treatment was less expensive over 5 years, costing $28,065. The model was only sensitive within a reasonable clinical range for Botox durability. BTX-A was more cost-effective over 5 years if the effect lasted for >5.1 months. The model was based on an AC complication rate of 40%. If the PAC complication rate<14%, AC was cheaper over 5 years. The model was sensitive to surgeons costs of BTX-A ($3,027) and facility costs of BTX-A ($1,004) and AC ($17,100).
conclusionsThis is the first cost analysis of BTX-A and AC. BTX-A is cheaper at durations>5.1 months and AC was cheaper when the cost of BTX-A increases or the AC complication rate dropped below 14%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.