Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21110017›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2011

Dielectrophoretic stretching of cells allows for characterization of their mechanical properties.

Isabella Guido, Magnus S Jaeger, Claus Duschl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabella GuidoFraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT), Am Muehlenberg 13, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Magnus S Jaeger
Claus Duschl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of biological cells is mainly determined by the cytoskeleton. Its properties are closely interlinked with many cellular events, including disease-related processes, and, thus, may be exploited as potent biomarkers. We have stretched two types of cells between microelectrodes through the application of dielectrophoretic forces. Small numbers of cells of cancerous origin (MCF-7) and from related noncancerous tissue (MCF-10A) were sufficient to obtain data that allowed us to unambiguously distinguish these cells. The Maxwell tension applied has been estimated to be 56 Pa. A detailed analysis of the cells showed that the differences in the stretching response are due to cell-specific mechanical properties. Through the addition of an actin- and a microtubule-specific toxin to the cells, differences in the microtubular structures of the two cell types have been identified as the major cause for the behavior observed. Our approach shows enormous potential for parallelization and automation. Hence, it should be suitable for achieving throughputs that make it attractive for many biomedical diagnostic purposes.

Indexed as

Shear StrengthStress, MechanicalActinsCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCytoskeletonElasticityElectromagnetic FieldsElectrophysiologyEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansKineticsMicroelectrodesMicrotubulesSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedActins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.