Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21109774›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2011

Best's macular dystrophy in Australia: phenotypic profile and identification of novel BEST1 mutations.

A C Cohn, C Turnbull, J B Ruddle, R H Guymer, L S Kearns, S Staffieri, H T Daggett, A W Hewitt, D A Mackey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A C CohnDepartment of Ophthalmology Melbourne, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
C Turnbull
J B Ruddle
R H Guymer
L S Kearns
S Staffieri
H T Daggett
A W Hewitt
D A Mackey
University of Melbourne · AUCentre for Eye Research Australia · AUUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose(1) To evaluate the spectrum of BEST1 mutations within Australian Best Disease or vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) pedigrees, including any novel mutations; (2) to analyse the range of clinical presentations of this cohort; (3) to determine any possible genotype-phenotype correlations and (4) to compare clinical data of patients with phenotypic VMD, both with and without a BEST1 mutation. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with suspected VMD were referred to clinical centres for ophthalmological assessment and genetic screening. When a mutation was identified in a proband, further family members were invited for clinical and genetic screening.

resultsWe identified 42 patients with one of 13 BEST1 mutations. Seven mutations were novel. There were a further 14 probands in whom a BEST1 mutation was not identified. Median visual acuity in both VMD (mutation positive) and clinical VMD (no BEST1 mutation identified) groups reached driving standards (6/12 or better).

conclusionWe did not identify any firm genotype-phenotype correlations in our Australian VMD pedigrees, in which there was a spectrum of BEST1 mutations and marked variation in clinical presentation. Genetic screening remains the gold standard for VMD diagnosis. Patients should be counselled that visual acuity might remain at or above driving standards in at least one eye even in the presence of a BEST1 mutation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaBestrophinsChildChild, PreschoolChloride ChannelsColor PerceptionDNA Mutational AnalysisEye ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBEST1 protein, humanBestrophinsChloride ChannelsEye Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21109774
PMCPMC3169215
OpenAlexW2067445334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.