Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21107724›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2011

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of capecitabine in head and neck cancer and normal cells.

Maria Wisniewska-Jarosinska, Tomasz Sliwinski, Jacek Kasznicki, Dariusz Kaczmarczyk, Renata Krupa, Karolina Bloch, Jozef Drzewoski, Jan Chojnacki, Janusz Blasiak, Alina Morawiec-Sztandera

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An Investigation of theMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Influence of the treatment with the antineoplastic agents 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin on the severity of experimental periodontitis in rats.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Wisniewska-JarosinskaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647, Lodz, Poland.
Tomasz Sliwinski
Jacek Kasznicki
Dariusz Kaczmarczyk
Renata Krupa
Karolina Bloch
Jozef Drzewoski
Jan Chojnacki
Janusz Blasiak
Alina Morawiec-Sztandera
Medical University of Lodz · PLUniversity of Łódź · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction between a chemical and a cell may strongly depend on whether this cell is normal or pathological. Side effects of anticancer drugs may sometimes overcome their benefit action, so it is important to investigate their effect in both the target and normal cells. Capecitabine (Xeloda, CAP), a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, is mainly used in colon cancer, but little is known about its action in head and neck cancer. We compared the cyto- and genotoxicity of CAP in head and neck HTB-43 cells and normal human lymphocytes by comet assay and flow cytometry. CAP at concentration up to 50 μM significantly decreased the viability of the cancer cells, whereas it did not affect normal lymphocytes. The drug did not interact with isolated plasmid DNA, but it damaged DNA in both cancer and normal cells. However, the extent of the damage in the former was much higher than in the latter. CAP induced apoptosis in the cancer cells, but not in normal lymphocytes. Pre-treatment of the cells with the nitrone spin traps α-(4-pyridil-1-oxide)-N-tert-butylnitrone and N-tert-butyl-α-phenylnitrone decreased the extent of CAP induced DNA damage, suggesting that free radicals may be involved in the formation of DNA lesions induced by CAP. The drug evoked an increase in the G0/G1 cell population accompanied by a decrease in the S cell population. CAP may evoke a pronounced cyto- and genotoxic effects in head and neck cancer cells, whereas it may or may not induce such effects in normal cells to far lesser extent.

Indexed as

CapecitabineCell CycleCell DeathCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalComet AssayDeoxycytidineDNA, CircularDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFluorouracilHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLymphocytesCapecitabineDeoxycytidineDNA, CircularDNA Repair EnzymesFluorouracilMutagensSpin Labels

Identifiers

PMID21107724
PMCPMC3115142
OpenAlexW2042797610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.