Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21107432›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2011

Olmesartan/amlodipine vs olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome: the OLAS study.

F J Martinez-Martin, H Rodriguez-Rosas, I Peiro-Martinez, P Soriano-Perera, P Pedrianes-Martin, C Comi-Diaz

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Arterial Hypertension-Oxidative Stress and Inflammation.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Olmesartan vs. ramipril in elderly hypertensive patients: review of data from two published randomized, double-blind studies.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. A review of the efficacy and tolerability of combination amlodipine/valsartan in non-white patients with hypertension.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2013
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F J Martinez-MartinOutpatient Hypertension Clinic, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin, Barranco de la Ballena, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. dr.j.martinez@gmail.com
H Rodriguez-Rosas
I Peiro-Martinez
P Soriano-Perera
P Pedrianes-Martin
C Comi-Diaz
Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the effects of treatment with olmesartan/amlodipine and olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide on inflammatory and metabolic parameters (including new-onset diabetes as a secondary endpoint) in non-diabetic hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). A total of 120 patients with MetS and stage I and II hypertension were randomized to olmesartan 20 mg/amlodipine 5 mg or olmesartan 20 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg. If target systolic blood pressure (<140 mm Hg) was not reached, doses were doubled after 13 weeks; doxazosin 4 mg was added after 26 weeks, and doubled after 39 weeks; follow-up ended at 78 weeks. At each visit, blood pressure (BP), fasting plasma glucose, insulin, adiponectin, tumour necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein (CRP), intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, interleukins-1β, -6 and -8, and albuminuria were measured; BP was similarly reduced in both groups; 80% of patients reached target BP. Reductions in albuminuria were also similar (50%). Only olmesartan/amlodipine reduced the insulin resistance index (24%, P<0.01), increased plasma adiponectin (16%, P<0.05) and significantly reduced all of the inflammation markers studied, except CRP, which showed a similar reduction in each group. The risk of new-onset diabetes was significantly lower with olmesartan/amlodipine (P=0.02). Both olmesartan-based combinations were effective, but the amlodipine combination resulted in metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects that may have advantages over the hydrochlorothiazide combination.

Indexed as

AdiponectinAdultAgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureComorbidityC-Reactive ProteinCytokinesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionImidazolesAdiponectinAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsC-Reactive ProteinCytokinesHydrochlorothiazideImidazolesIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1olmesartanTetrazolesVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

Identifiers

PMID21107432
PMCPMC3099035
OpenAlexW2060299147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.