Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21107347›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2010

The challenge of immunogenicity in the quest for induced pluripotency.

Paul J Fairchild

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Banking on iPSC--is it doable and is it worthwhile.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2015
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul J FairchildSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK. Paul.Fairchild@path.ox.ac.uk

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few advances have been so widely acclaimed in biology as the seminal demonstration that adult somatic cells can be induced to acquire the phenotype and differentiation potential of embryonic stem cells. The capacity to produce patient-specific stem cells that are truly pluripotent has raised prospects for the treatment of many degenerative diseases through replacement of the affected cell types. In the race to the clinic, however, questions surrounding the potential immunogenicity of such cells have been largely overlooked. Here, I explore the extent of the challenges ahead and suggest that the induction of tolerance to such cells will be crucial to the future success of induced pluripotency.

Indexed as

Cell TransplantationTransplantation ToleranceAdultAnimalsEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceRatsTranscription FactorsTransduction, GeneticTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21107347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.