ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Physicians' opinions of a health information exchange.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: a systematic review.International journal of medical informatics · 2016Pooled it
- Article
- Organizational characteristics and perceptions of clinical event notification services in healthcare settings: a study of health information exchange.JAMIA open · 2020Article
- Mental health professional perspectives on health data sharing: Mixed methods study.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- Mental health professionals' perceptions on patients control of data sharing.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- Health Information Technology and Doctor Shopping: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Factors impacting physician use of information charted by others.JAMIA open · 2019Article
- Falling short: how state laws can address health information exchange barriers and enablers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Ethnographic analysis on the use of the electronic medical record for clinical handoff.Internal and emergency medicine · 2017Article
- Linking the health data system in the U.S.: Challenges to the benefits.International journal of nursing sciences · 2017Review
- A Study to Elicit Behavioral Health Patients' and Providers' Opinions on Health Records Consent.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2017Article
- Patients' support for health information exchange: a literature review and classification of key factors.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Review
- Health information exchange associated with improved emergency department care through faster accessing of patient information from outside organizations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- Assessment of the usability and impact of the Idaho Health Data Exchange (IHDE).Journal of medical systems · 2016Article
- Impact of Health Information Exchange on Emergency Medicine Clinical Decision Making.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2015Observational
- Uncovering Hospitalists' Information Needs from Outside Healthcare Facilities in the Context of Health Information Exchange Using Association Rule Learning.Applied clinical informatics · 2015Article
- Data Content and Exchange in General Practice: a Review.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2014Review
- Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States.JMIR medical informatics · 2014Article
- Creating a connected community: lessons learned from the Western new york beacon community.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2014Article
- Physicians' perceptions and use of a health information exchange: a pilot program in South Korea.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArizona Medicaid developed a Health Information Exchange (HIE) system called the Arizona Medical Information Exchange (AMIE).
objectiveTo evaluate physicians' perceptions regarding AMIE's impact on health outcomes and healthcare costs. MEASUREMENTS: A focus-group guide was developed and included five domains: perceived impact of AMIE on (1) quality of care; (2) workflow and efficiency; (3) healthcare costs; (4) system usability; and (5) AMIE data content. Qualitative data were analyzed using analytical coding.
resultsA total of 29 clinicians participated in the study. The attendance rate was 66% (N=19) for the first and last month of focus-group meetings and 52% (N=15) for the focus group meetings conducted during the second month. The benefits most frequently mentioned during the focus groups included: (1) identification of "doctor shopping"; (2) averting duplicative testing; and (3) increased efficiency of clinical information gathering. The most frequent disadvantage mentioned was the limited availability of data in the AMIE system.
conclusionRespondents reported that AMIE had the potential to improve care, but they felt that AMIE impact was limited due to the data available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.