Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21106822›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2010

The absence of eye muscle fatigue indicates that the nervous system compensates for non-motor disturbances of oculomotor function.

Mario Prsa, Peter W Dicke, Peter Thier

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Corollary Discharge Signals in the Cerebellum.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evidence for hyperbolic temporal discounting of reward in control of movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mario PrsaDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Peter W Dicke
Peter Thier
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical properties of our bodies are subject to change (due to fatigue, heavy equipment, injury or aging) as we move around in the surrounding environment. The traditional definition of motor adaptation dictates that a mechanism in our brain needs to compensate for such alterations by appropriately modifying neural motor commands, if the vitally important accuracy of executed movements is to be preserved. In this article we describe how a repetitive eye movement task brings about changes in eye saccade kinematics that compromise accurate motor performance in the absence of a proper compensatory response. Surgical lesions in animals and human patient studies have previously demonstrated that an intact cerebellum is necessary for the compensation to arise and prevent the occurrence of hypometric movements. Here we identified the dynamic properties of the eye plant by recording from abducens motoneurons responsible for the required movement and measured the muscle response to microstimulation of the abducens nucleus in rhesus monkeys. The ensuing results demonstrate that the muscular periphery remains intact during the fatiguing eye movement task, while internal sources of noise (drowsiness, attentional modulation, neuronal fatigue etc.) must be responsible for a diminished oculomotor performance. This finding leads to the important realization that while supervising the accuracy of our movements, the nervous system takes additionally into account and adapts to any disruptive processes within the brain itself, clearly unrelated to the dynamical behavior of muscles or the environment. The existence of this supplementary mechanism forces a reassessment of traditional views of cerebellum-dependent motor adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemEye MovementsMacaca mulattaMuscle FatigueOculomotor MusclesPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID21106822
PMCPMC6633742
OpenAlexW2041017878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.