Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21106575›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2011

Comparison of a poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone and human amniotic membrane for urothelium tissue engineering applications.

Reetta Sartoneva, Suvi Haimi, Susanna Miettinen, Bettina Mannerström, Anne-Marie Haaparanta, George K Sándor, Minna Kellomäki, Riitta Suuronen, Tuija Lahdes-Vasama

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Challenges of using tissue engineering methods in the treatment of hypospadias.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Electrospinning: Application and Prospects for Urologic Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Urethral reconstruction with tissue-engineered human amniotic scaffold in rabbit urethral injury models.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reetta SartonevaRegea-Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. reetta.sartoneva@regea.fi
Suvi Haimi
Susanna Miettinen
Bettina Mannerström
Anne-Marie Haaparanta
George K Sándor
Minna Kellomäki
Riitta Suuronen
Tuija Lahdes-Vasama
Tampere University · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reconstructive surgery of urothelial defects, such as severe hypospadias is susceptible to complications. The major problem is the lack of suitable grafting materials. Therefore, finding alternative treatments such as reconstruction of urethra using tissue engineering is essential. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of naturally derived acellular human amniotic membrane (hAM) to synthetic poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone (PLCL) on human urothelial cell (hUC) viability, proliferation and urothelial differentiation level. The viability of cells was evaluated using live/dead staining and the proliferation was studied using WST-1 measurement. Cytokeratin (CK)7/8 and CK19 were used to confirm that the hUCs maintained their phenotype on different biomaterials. On the PLCL, the cell number significantly increased during the culturing period, in contrast to the hAM, where hUC proliferation was the weakest at 7 and 14 days. In addition, the majority of cells were viable and maintained their phenotype when cultured on PLCL and cell culture plastic, whereas on the hAM, the viability of hUCs decreased with time and the cells did not maintain their phenotype. The PLCL membranes supported the hUC proliferation significantly more than the hAM. These results revealed the significant potential of PLCL membranes in urothelial tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

AmnionCell SurvivalFlow CytometryHumansKeratin-19Keratin-7Keratin-8PhenotypePolyestersSurface PropertiesTime FactorsTissue EngineeringUrotheliumKeratin-19Keratin-7Keratin-8lactide-caprolactone copolymerPolyesters

Identifiers

PMID21106575
PMCPMC3061098
OpenAlexW2106179956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.