ReviewHuman genomics2010
What the papers say: text mining for genomics and systems biology.
Review in Human genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing to Review and Classify the Medical Literature on Cancer Susceptibility Genes.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019Pooled it
- Enhanced semantic classification of microbiome sample origins using large language models (LLMs).GigaScience · 2026Article
- Integrating Text Mining into the Curation of Disease Maps.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Laying the groundwork for the Biobank of Rare Malignant Neoplasms at the service of the Hellenic Network of Precision Medicine on Cancer.International journal of oncology · 2022Article
- PREGO: A Literature and Data-Mining Resource to Associate Microorganisms, Biological Processes, and Environment Types.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Application of Text Mining in Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures: A Case Study of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs).Environmental health perspectives · 2021Article
- Extracting knowledge networks from plant scientific literature: potato tuber flesh color as an exemplary trait.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of literature searching tools for curation of mismatch repair gene variants in hereditary colon cancer.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Hybrid modelling for stroke care: Review and suggestions of new approaches for risk assessment and simulation of scenarios.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Review
- Genome-wide functional association networks: background, data & state-of-the-art resources.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- Translating cancer genomics into precision medicine with artificial intelligence: applications, challenges and future perspectives.Human genetics · 2019Review
- Article
- Text Mining of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Diabetes Mellitus to Understand the Mechanisms of Chinese Medicine in Different Diseases with Same Treatment.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2018Article
- FunCoup 4: new species, data, and visualization.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Hierarchical bi-directional attention-based RNNs for supporting document classification on protein-protein interactions affected by genetic mutations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- How to deal with parameters for whole-cell modelling.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Review
- From comorbidities of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to identification of shared molecular mechanisms by data integration.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Semantic annotation of biological concepts interplaying microbial cellular responses.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Verification of systems biology research in the age of collaborative competition.Nature biotechnology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Keeping up with the rapidly growing literature has become virtually impossible for most scientists. This can have dire consequences. First, we may waste research time and resources on reinventing the wheel simply because we can no longer maintain a reliable grasp on the published literature. Second, and perhaps more detrimental, judicious (or serendipitous) combination of knowledge from different scientific disciplines, which would require following disparate and distinct research literatures, is rapidly becoming impossible for even the most ardent readers of research publications. Text mining - the automated extraction of information from (electronically) published sources - could potentially fulfil an important role - but only if we know how to harness its strengths and overcome its weaknesses. As we do not expect that the rate at which scientific results are published will decrease, text mining tools are now becoming essential in order to cope with, and derive maximum benefit from, this information explosion. In genomics, this is particularly pressing as more and more rare disease-causing variants are found and need to be understood. Not being conversant with this technology may put scientists and biomedical regulators at a severe disadvantage. In this review, we introduce the basic concepts underlying modern text mining and its applications in genomics and systems biology. We hope that this review will serve three purposes: (i) to provide a timely and useful overview of the current status of this field, including a survey of present challenges; (ii) to enable researchers to decide how and when to apply text mining tools in their own research; and (iii) to highlight how the research communities in genomics and systems biology can help to make text mining from biomedical abstracts and texts more straightforward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.