Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21106271›Full record

ArticleTrends in genetics : TIG2011

DNA double-strand break repair and the evolution of intron density.

Ashley Farlow, Eshwar Meduri, Christian Schlötterer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The mutation landscape ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DNA Double-Strand Breaks: A Double-Edged Sword for Trypanosomatids.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Expansion and Functional Diversification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emergence and loss of spliceosomal twin introns.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Intron evolution in Saccharomycetaceae.Genome biology and evolution · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashley FarlowInstitute of Population Genetics, Vetmeduni Vienna, Austria.
Eshwar Meduri
Christian Schlötterer
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 19832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The density of introns is both an important feature of genome architecture and a highly variable trait across eukaryotes. This heterogeneity has posed an evolutionary puzzle for the last 30 years. Recent evidence is consistent with novel introns being the outcome of the error-prone repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Here we suggest that deletion of pre-existing introns could occur via the same pathway. We propose a novel framework in which species-specific differences in the activity of NHEJ and homologous recombination (HR) during the repair of DSBs underlie changes in intron density.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairEvolution, MolecularIntronsAnimalsHumansRNA Splice SitesSpecies SpecificityRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID21106271
PMCPMC3020277
OpenAlexW1987859656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.