Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21105895›Full record

SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2011

Systematic review of the management of incontinence and promotion of continence in older people in care homes: descriptive studies with urinary incontinence as primary focus.

Brenda Roe, Lisa Flanagan, Barbara Jack, James Barrett, Alan Chung, Christine Shaw, Kate Williams

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03166150 (Urinary Incontinence, Mobility & Muscle Function in Older Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03166150 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Urinary Incontinence, Mobility & Muscle Function in Older Women: Functional Assessment and Muscle Evaluation Through Exercise (FAME) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoward UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled18ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsMulti-modal rehabilitation program, Pelvic Floor Physical therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. The Gut in Older Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brenda RoeHealth Research Evidence-based Practice Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Edge Hill University, UK. brenda.roe@edgehill.ac.uk
Lisa Flanagan
Barbara Jack
James Barrett
Alan Chung
Christine Shaw
Kate Williams
Edge Hill University · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis is a review of descriptive studies with incontinence as the primary focus in older people in care homes.

backgroundIncontinence is prevalent among residents of care home populations. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched from 1996 to 2007 using the highly sensitive search strings of the Cochrane Incontinence Review Group for urinary and faecal incontinence including all research designs. Search strings were modified to enhance selectiveness for care homes and older people and exclude studies involving surgical or pharmacological interventions. Searching of reference sections from identified studies was also used to supplement electronic searches. The Cochrane Library was searched for relevant systematic reviews to locate relevant studies from those included or excluded from reviews. The search was limited to English-language publications.

methodsA systematic review of studies on the management of incontinence, promotion of continence or maintenance of continence in care homes was conducted in 2007-2009. This is a report of descriptive studies. Results. Ten studies were identified that reported on prevalence and incidence of incontinence (urinary with or without faecal), policies, assessment, documentation, management or economic evaluation of its management. Use of incontinence pads and toileting programmes comprised the most common management approaches used. No studies were identified that attempted to maintain continence of residents in care homes.

conclusionsStudies on maintaining continence and identifying components of toileting programmes that are successful in managing or preventing incontinence and promoting continence in residents of care home populations along with their economic evaluation are warranted.

Indexed as

Health PromotionNursing ResearchActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFecal IncontinenceFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHomes for the AgedHumansIncontinence PadsMaleMedical RecordsNursing AssessmentPatient Care Planning

Identifiers

PMID21105895
PMCPMC3132440
OpenAlexW1481819761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.