ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2011
Are cardiovascular benefits in statin lipid effects dependent on baseline lipid levels?
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of statins on the function and differentiation of blood cells.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2023Article
- High LDL cholesterol and statin use were independently associated with lower eight-year mortality in a cohort free from terminal illness, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes at baseline.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2014Article
- Association of lipoprotein levels with mortality in subjects aged 50 + without previous diabetes or cardiovascular disease: a population-based register study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2013Article
- Genome association study of human chromosome 13 and susceptibility to coronary artery disease in a Chinese population.Journal of genetics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statins reduce coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality over a wide range of patients. The Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) in subjects with elevated C-reactive protein, without vascular disease and below average low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) showed a 50% reduction in LDL-C with 20 mg/d of rosuvastatin and a reduction in cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.56 [95% CI, 0.46-0.69]; P < 0.00001), and a reduction in total mortality (20%; P < 0.02). Recent commentary has criticized perceived JUPITER design flaws and inappropriate influence. However, the Canadian 2009 guidelines cite JUPITER as class I evidence for statin benefit. Although the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators showed that, regardless of pre-treatment levels, statins can significantly reduce CHD, major vascular events, and overall mortality, a recent primary prevention meta-analysis showed no decrease in all-cause mortality. Preconceived notions on statin benefit or harm do not enhance patient care and clinicians should individualize long-term statin therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.