ArticleOecologia2011
Will the CO2 fertilization effect in forests be offset by reduced tree longevity?
Article in Oecologia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.
- Climate Change Projected to Increase Rates of Background Tree Mortality Across Eastern North America.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Diagnosing Linearity Along the Carbon Cascade in Terrestrial Biosphere Models and Observations.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Conceptual pitfalls in the forest carbon debate : Comment solicited by Prof Yiping (Rocky) Wu, 30 Aug. 2025, revised Dec 2025.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- Demography, dynamics and data: building confidence for simulating changes in the world's forests.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Contrasting sap flow characteristics between pioneer and late-successional tree species in secondary tropical montane forests of Eastern Himalaya, India.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Drivers of Decadal Carbon Fluxes Across Temperate Ecosystems.Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences · 2022Article
- Links across ecological scales: Plant biomass responses to elevated COGlobal change biology · 2022Review
- The evolution, complexity and diversity of models of long-term forest dynamics.The Journal of ecology · 2022Article
- Process-oriented analysis of dominant sources of uncertainty in the land carbon sink.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Forest disturbances and climate constrain carbon allocation dynamics in trees.Global change biology · 2022Article
- Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models.Ecology and evolution · 2021Review
- Global tree-ring analysis reveals rapid decrease in tropical tree longevity with temperature.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Forest carbon sink neutralized by pervasive growth-lifespan trade-offs.Nature communications · 2020Article
- The impact of long dry periods on the aboveground biomass in a tropical forests: 20 years of monitoring.Carbon balance and management · 2020Article
- Limited capacity of tree growth to mitigate the global greenhouse effect under predicted warming.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Tree mortality submodels drive simulated long-term forest dynamics: assessing 15 models from the stand to global scale.Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) · 2019Article
- Carbon uptake by mature Amazon forests has mitigated Amazon nations' carbon emissions.Carbon balance and management · 2017Article
- Among-tree variability and feedback effects result in different growth responses to climate change at the upper treeline in the Swiss Alps.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
- Trade-Offs between Growth Rate, Tree Size and Lifespan of Mountain Pine (Pinus montana) in the Swiss National Park.PloS one · 2016Article
- Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink.Nature · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental studies suggest that tree growth is stimulated in a greenhouse atmosphere, leading to faster carbon accumulation (i.e., a higher rate of gap filling). However, higher growth may be coupled with reduced longevity, thus leading to faster carbon release (i.e., a higher rate of gap creation). The net effect of these two counteracting processes is not known. We quantify this net effect on aboveground carbon stocks using a novel combination of data sets and modeling. Data on maximum growth rate and maximum longevity of 141 temperate tree species are used to derive a relationship between growth stimulation and changes in longevity. We employ this relationship to modify the respective parameter values of tree species in a forest succession model and study aboveground biomass in a factorial design of growth stimulation × reduced maximum longevity at multiple sites along a climate gradient from the cold to the dry treeline. The results show that (1) any growth stimulation at the tree level leads to a disproportionately small increase of stand biomass due to negative feedback effects, even in the absence of reduced longevity; (2) a reduction of tree longevity tends to offset the growth-related biomass increase; at the most likely value of reduced longevity, the net effect is very close to zero in most multi- and single-species simulations; and (3) when averaging the response across all sites to mimic a "landscape-level" response, the net effect is close to zero. Thus, it is important to consider ecophysiological responses with their linkage to demographic processes in forest trees if one wishes to avoid erroneous inference at the ecosystem level. We conclude that any CO(2) fertilization effect is quite likely to be offset by an associated reduction in the longevity of forest trees, thus strongly reducing the carbon mitigation potential of temperate forests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.