Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21104066›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2011

Development of adenoviral vector-based mucosal vaccine against influenza.

Irina L Tutykhina, Denis Y Logunov, Dmitriy N Shcherbinin, Maxim M Shmarov, Amir I Tukhvatulin, Boris S Naroditsky, Alexander L Gintsburg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Progress on adenovirus-vectored universal influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. H5N1 vaccines in humans.Virus research · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irina L TutykhinaLaboratory of Molecular Biotechnology, Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, ul. Gamaleya 18, Moscow 123098, Russia.
Denis Y Logunov
Dmitriy N Shcherbinin
Maxim M Shmarov
Amir I Tukhvatulin
Boris S Naroditsky
Alexander L Gintsburg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent pandemic threat of the influenza virus makes the increased safety and efficiency of vaccination against the pathogen a most important issue. It has been well established that for maximum protective effect, the vaccination should mimic natural infection. Therefore, recent efforts to develop a new influenza vaccine have focused on intranasal immunization strategies. Intranasal immunization is capable of inducing secretory IgA and serum IgG responses to provide a double defense against mucosal pathogens. On the other hand, it is desirable that a live pathogen is not present in the vaccine. In addition, for optimal induction of the immune responses via the nasal route, efficient and safe mucosal adjuvants are also required. This is possible to attain using an adenoviral vector for vaccine development. Adenoviral vectors are capable of delivering and protecting the antigen encoding sequence. They also possess a natural mechanism for penetrating into the nasal mucous membrane and are capable of activating the innate immune response. This review describes the basic prerequisites for the involvement of recombinant adenoviruses for mucosal (nasal) vaccine development against the influenza virus.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeGenetic VectorsAnimalsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMucous MembraneRespiratory SystemVaccines, SyntheticInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.