Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21103921›Full record

Trial reportCancer causes & control : CCC2011

Nutritional supplements, COX-2 and IGF-1 expression in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

June M Chan, Vivian Weinberg, Mark J Magbanua, Eduardo Sosa, Jeffry Simko, Katsuto Shinohara, Scot Federman, Mike Mattie, Millie Hughes-Fulford, Christopher Haqq and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effect of green tea and lycopene on the insulin-like growth factor system: the ProDiet randomized controlled trial.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

June M ChanDepartment of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, 1450 3rd Street, San Francisco, CA 94158-9001, USA. june.chan@ucsf.edu
Vivian Weinberg
Mark J Magbanua
Eduardo Sosa
Jeffry Simko
Katsuto Shinohara
Scot Federman
Mike Mattie
Millie Hughes-Fulford
Christopher Haqq
Peter R Carroll
University of California, San Francisco · USUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Molecular Effects of Nutrition Supplements in ProstateR01CA101042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CARROLL, PETER R · 2003 to 2007
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101042NCI NIH HHS R01CA101042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutritional factors are associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer progression, yet mechanisms remain unclear. We examined the effects of lycopene and fish oil supplements versus placebo on the normal prostate microenvironment, among men pursuing active surveillance for low-burden prostate cancer. We hypothesized that lycopene or fish oil supplements would down-regulate insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) gene expression, respectively, reflecting putative proliferation (IGF-1) and inflammatory (COX-2) pathways relevant to carcinogenesis.

methodsWe conducted a 3-month randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial comparing prostate tissue gene expression profiles (assessed by qRT-PCR) among men with favorable-risk prostate cancer receiving either 30 mg/day lycopene, 3 g/day fish oil (including 1,098 mg eicosapentaenoic and 549 mg docosahexaenoic fatty acids) or placebo.

resultsAmong 69 men (22 assigned to lycopene, 21 to fish, and 26 to placebo), there was no difference in the change from baseline to the 3 months in IGF-1 expression level between the placebo and lycopene arms (p = 0.93) nor in COX-2 expression between the placebo and fish arms (p = 0.99).

conclusionCompared to placebo, 3-month intervention with lycopene or fish oil did not significantly change IGF-1 and COX-2 gene expression in the normal prostate microenvironment in men with low-burden prostate cancer. Further analysis of global gene expression profiles may shed light on the bioactivity and relevance of these nutrients in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCarotenoidsCyclooxygenase 2Double-Blind MethodFish OilsGene Expression ProfilingHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILycopeneMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionWatchful WaitingAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCarotenoidsCyclooxygenase 2Fish OilsInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILycopenePTGS2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21103921
PMCPMC3002170
OpenAlexW1995808146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.