Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21103122›Full record

ArticleJRSM short reports2010

How do the information needs of cancer patients differ at different stages of the cancer journey? A cross-sectional survey.

A Mistry, S Wilson, T Priestman, S Damery, Ms Haque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JRSM short reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predicting cancer prognosis using interactive online tools: a systematic review and implications for cancer care providers.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Utility of a Referral Letter to Improve Comprehensibility of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: a Single-Center Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Information Seeking Behaviors and Preferences of Cancer Survivors: A Cross-sectional Study in Shanghai, China.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Unmet non-medical needs of cancer patients in Poland: a quantitative and qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Informational needs and predictors of Jordanian breast and colorectal cancer survivors: a national cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Information Received and Usefulness of the Sources of Information to Cancer Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre in Malaysia.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnosed with a common cancer at an unusual age: causal attributions of survivors of adolescent and young adult colorectal cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A MistrySchool of Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , UK.
S Wilson
T Priestman
S Damery
Ms Haque

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProviding information to cancer patients can have significant benefits to their psychological wellbeing. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how information needs may differ for patients at different stages of the cancer journey.

designCross-sectional, self-completed survey using convenience sampling.

settingOncology outpatients in Wolverhampton, West Midlands.

participantsCancer patients aged 18 years and over.

main outcome measuresThe survey used Likert scales to determine whether patients wished to know more about 35 items of information categorized under seven domains: cancer (diagnosis); prognosis; treatment; rehabilitation; psychological/spiritual; social/family; and body image/sexuality. Each domain was scored, with higher scores indicating a greater wish for information.

resultsThere were 187 participants (50% response rate). Patients tended to want more information, particularly related to prognosis. Post-treatment patients continued to have information needs comparable to patients undergoing treatment or at the pre-treatment stage, except with reference to treatment-related information (p = <0.01), although as time from diagnosis increased, information needs reduced. Educational attainment, age, treatment status, gender and ethnicity were all significant predictors of scores in various domains.

conclusionThis study indicates that the time since diagnosis may interact with various demographic and disease-related factors in contributing to the information needs of cancer patients. The majority of cancer patients wish to know more about a wide range of factors, and such information seeking preferences are present regardless of an individual's stage following diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID21103122
PMCPMC2984359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.