Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21102995›Full record

ArticleSleep2010

Motor unit recruitment in human genioglossus muscle in response to hypercapnia.

Christian L Nicholas, Bei Bei, Christopher Worsnop, Atul Malhotra, Amy S Jordan, Julian P Saboisky, Julia K M Chan, Ella Duckworth, David P White, John Trinder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Activation of upper airway muscles during breathing and swallowing.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Activities of human genioglossus motor units.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2011
    Review
  20. Recruitment and rate-coding strategies of the human genioglossus muscle.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian L NicholasSchool of Psychological Science, University of melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Bei Bei
Christopher Worsnop
Atul Malhotra
Amy S Jordan
Julian P Saboisky
Julia K M Chan
Ella Duckworth
David P White
John Trinder
University of Melbourne · AUBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Single Motor Unit Genioglossus Recordings to Understand Sleep Apnea PathogenesisR01HL085188 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2008 to 2018
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01HL085188-01A2NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivessingle motor unit recordings of the genioglossus (GG) muscle indicate that GG motor units have a variety of discharge patterns, including units that have higher discharge rates during inspiration (inspiratory phasic and inspiratory tonic), or expiration (expiratory phasic and expiratory tonic), or do not modify their rate with respiration (tonic). Previous studies have shown that an increase in GG muscle activity is a consequence of increased activity in inspiratory units. However, there are differences between studies as to whether this increase is primarily due to recruitment of new motor units (motor unit recruitment) or to increased discharge rate of already active units (rate coding). Sleep-wake state studies in humans have suggested the former, while hypercapnia experiments in rats have suggested the latter. In this study, we investigated the effect of hypercapnia on GG motor unit activity in humans during wakefulness.

settingsleep research laboratory.

participantssixteen healthy men. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultseach participant was administered at least 6 trials with P(et)CO(2) being elevated 8.4 (SD = 1.96) mm Hg over 2 min following a 30-s baseline. Subjects were instrumented for GG EMG and respiratory measurements with 4 fine wire electrodes inserted subcutaneously into the muscle. One hundred forty-one motor units were identified during the baseline: 47% were inspiratory modulated, 29% expiratory modulated, and 24% showed no respiratory related modulation. Sixty-two new units were recruited during hypercapnia. The distribution of recruited units was significantly different from the baseline distribution, with 84% being inspiratory modulated (P < 0.001). Neither units active during baseline, nor new units recruited during hypercapnia, increased their discharge rate as P(et)CO(2) increased (P > 0.05 for all comparisons).

conclusionsincreased GG muscle activity in humans occurs because of recruitment of previously inactive inspiratory modulated units.

Indexed as

Recruitment, NeurophysiologicalAdultElectrodes, ImplantedElectromyographyHumansHypercapniaHypoglossal NerveMaleMotor NeuronsReference ValuesRespiratory MechanicsRespiratory MusclesWakefulnessmotor controlobstructive sleep apneaSingle motor unitupper airway muscles

Identifiers

PMID21102995
PMCPMC2954703
OpenAlexW1514374179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.