Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21102527›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2011

Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias.

Joshua B Plotkin, Grzegorz Kudla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 888 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
888citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

888 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Gradient-based optimization for mRNA sequence design.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multilevel genomic constraints shape nuclear tRNA gene organization in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

828 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joshua B PlotkinDepartment of Biology and Program in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, University of Pennsylvania, 433 South University Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. jplotkin@sas.upenn.edu
Grzegorz Kudla

Funding

Vaccine strategy for broad spectrum protection agains non-typhoidal salmonellU54AI057168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WHITE, JUDITH M. · 2003 to 2013
$91.5M
NIAID NIH HHS 2U54AI057168NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057168Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their name, synonymous mutations have significant consequences for cellular processes in all taxa. As a result, an understanding of codon bias is central to fields as diverse as molecular evolution and biotechnology. Although recent advances in sequencing and synthetic biology have helped to resolve longstanding questions about codon bias, they have also uncovered striking patterns that suggest new hypotheses about protein synthesis. Ongoing work to quantify the dynamics of initiation and elongation is as important for understanding natural synonymous variation as it is for designing transgenes in applied contexts.

Indexed as

GenomeMutationAnimalsCodonDrosophila ProteinsGene ExpressionHumansMiceProtein BiosynthesisCodonDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21102527
PMCPMC3074964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.