ArticleBone marrow transplantation2011
The outcome of high-dose chemotherapy and auto-SCT in patients with multiple myeloma: a UK/Ireland and European benchmarking comparative analysis.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- HLA-mismatched stem cell microtransplant prolonged overall survival and promoted immunological reconstitution for multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Time to Next Treatment as a Meaningful Endpoint for Trials of Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma.Cancers · 2020Article
- Productivity losses in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma following stem cell transplantation and the impact of maintenance therapy.European journal of haematology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auto-SCT is the standard first-line consolidative therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We performed a national benchmarking outcome analysis for patients with MM who underwent a single auto-SCT in 1999 and 2005. They were identified from the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (BSBMT) (n=211 and n=453) and EBMT (n=1311 and n=1978) registries. An improvement in Day+100 and D+365 non-relapsed mortality (NRM) was shown between years 1999 and 2005 (P=0.0495). The 4-year relapse rate (RR) was significantly higher in 2005 (P=0.0003) and was associated with a shorter time to next treatment (TTNT) (P=0.025). The 4-year PFS was significantly lower in 2005 (P=0.0012), with the year of auto-SCT (P=0.001) and status at auto-SCT (P=0.02) being independently significant. The 4-year OS was similar between the year cohorts (P=0.266). In the 'benchmarking' comparison, the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) 1999 cohort demonstrated the best PFS, although no year-of-transplant effect could be demonstrated on the 4-year OS rates (P=0.760). An improvement in supportive care resulting in reduced NRM is evident between the decades. The main cause of treatment failure remains disease progression. The similarity in OS between the years may reflect the introduction of novel agents in salvage therapy. The reduced PFS in 2005 is as yet not fully explained, but may represent recent disease response criterion standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.