Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21102428›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2011

Integrated use of minimal residual disease classification and IKZF1 alteration status accurately predicts 79% of relapses in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

E Waanders, V H J van der Velden, C E van der Schoot, F N van Leeuwen, S V van Reijmersdal, V de Haas, A J Veerman, A Geurts van Kessel, P M Hoogerbrugge, R P Kuiper and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Multifaceted roles ofFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. The Prognostic Effect ofHemaSphere · 2023
    Article
  15. Case Report: RareGenes · 2023
    Article
  16. Impact ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  17. Genomic landscape of T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2022
    Article
  18. Clinical and Genetic Characteristics ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

E WaandersDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University Centre of Oncology and Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
V H J van der Velden
C E van der Schoot
F N van Leeuwen
S V van Reijmersdal
V de Haas
A J Veerman
A Geurts van Kessel
P M Hoogerbrugge
R P Kuiper
J J M van Dongen
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLErasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLSanquin · NLStichting Kinderoncologie Nederland · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response to therapy as determined by minimal residual disease (MRD) is currently used for stratification in treatment protocols for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, the large MRD-based medium risk group (MRD-M; 50-60% of the patients) harbors many relapses. We analyzed MRD in 131 uniformly treated precursor-B-ALL patients and evaluated whether combined MRD and IKZF1 (Ikaros zinc finger-1) alteration status can improve risk stratification. We confirmed the strong prognostic significance of MRD classification, which was independent of IKZF1 alterations. Notably, 8 of the 11 relapsed cases in the large MRD-M group (n=81; 62%) harbored an IKZF1 alteration. Integration of both MRD and IKZF1 status resulted in a favorable outcome group (n=104; 5 relapses) and a poor outcome group (n=27; 19 relapses), and showed a stronger prognostic value than each of the established risk factors alone (hazard ratio (95%CI): 24.98 (8.29-75.31)). Importantly, whereas MRD and IKZF1 status alone identified only 46 and 54% of the relapses, respectively, their integrated use allowed prediction of 79% of all the relapses with 93% specificity. Because of the unprecedented sensitivity in upfront relapse prediction, the combined parameters have high potential for future risk stratification, particularly for patients originally classified as non-high risk, such as the large group of MRD-M patients.

Indexed as

Predictive Value of TestsChildGene RearrangementHumansIkaros Transcription FactorKaplan-Meier EstimateMutationNeoplasm, ResidualPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRecurrenceRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityIkaros Transcription FactorIKZF1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21102428
OpenAlexW1998576290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.