Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21099589›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2010

Pelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraception.

Jillian T Henderson, George F Sawaya, Maya Blum, Laura Stratton, Cynthia C Harper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bills as Band-Aids: Hopes and Challenges of Expanding Pharmacists' Prescriptive Authority to Include Contraceptives.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Cervical cancer screening among young adult women in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jillian T HendersonFrom the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
George F Sawaya
Maya Blum
Laura Stratton
Cynthia C Harper

Funding

CTSA: K12 COMPONENTKL2RR024130 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$19.3M
Providers'perceptions of the diaphragm in Southern Afr*R01HD046027 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI HARPER, CYNTHIA C · 2003 to 2005
$1.1M
Women's Reproductive Health Care in the Transition from Adolescence to AdulthoodK01HD054495 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HENDERSON, JILLIAN T · 2007 to 2011
$539k
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024130NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD054495NICHD NIH HHS K01HD054495NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRequiring a pelvic examination before prescribing oral contraception poses an unnecessary barrier to contraceptive access. Medical guidelines have outlined the safety of oral contraception provision without a pelvic examination, yet little is known about the practices of clinicians providing reproductive health care. Our purpose was to investigate clinicians' requirements for pelvic examination and what may account for practice differences.

methodsWe administered a mailed survey to a national probability sample of obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns), family medicine physicians, and advanced practice nurses specializing in obstetrics and gynecology and women's health or family medicine in 2008-2009 (N=1,196), with a response rate of 65.3%.

resultsNearly one third of ob-gyns and family medicine physicians reported always requiring a pelvic examination when prescribing oral contraception (ob-gyns 29%; family medicine 33%). A higher proportion of advanced practice nurses in primary care (45%) and a markedly lower percentage of advanced practice nurses in reproductive health (17%) reported always requiring the examination. In adjusted analyses, older clinicians were more likely to require the pelvic examination (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, P<.01) and clinicians serving a higher proportion of Medicaid patients more likely (OR 1.62, P<.05). Providers in private practice were more than twice as likely as those working in family-planning or community clinics to require pelvic examinations (OR 2.30, P<.01).

conclusionOne third of clinicians we surveyed require pelvic examinations before provision of oral contraceptives, despite guidelines indicating they are unnecessary and research suggesting they can pose a barrier to contraceptive access.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, Oral, HormonalGynecological ExaminationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Advanced Practice NursingData CollectionFamily PracticeFemaleGynecologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedObstetricsContraceptives, Oral, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID21099589
PMCPMC3745305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.