ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2010
Pelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraception.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed Visits for Contraception Due to Concerns Regarding Pelvic Examination Among Women with History of Intimate Partner Violence.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Trial
- Interest in over-the-counter progestin-only pills among transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive individuals in the United States.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Male contraception is coming: Who do men want to prescribe their birth control?Contraception · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States.JAMA internal medicine · 2020Article
- Bills as Band-Aids: Hopes and Challenges of Expanding Pharmacists' Prescriptive Authority to Include Contraceptives.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2019Article
- Using behavioral economic theory to increase use of effective contraceptives among opioid-maintained women at risk of unintended pregnancy.Preventive medicine · 2016Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2015Article
- Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners.Preventive medicine · 2013Article
- Cervical cancer screening among young adult women in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013Article
- Routine bimanual pelvic examinations: practices and beliefs of US obstetrician-gynecologists.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2013Article
- Changes to cervical cancer prevention guidelines: effects on screening among U.S. women ages 15-29.Preventive medicine · 2013Article
- Reproductive health preventive screening among clinic vs. over-the-counter oral contraceptive users.Contraception · 2012Article
- Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists.Family medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRequiring a pelvic examination before prescribing oral contraception poses an unnecessary barrier to contraceptive access. Medical guidelines have outlined the safety of oral contraception provision without a pelvic examination, yet little is known about the practices of clinicians providing reproductive health care. Our purpose was to investigate clinicians' requirements for pelvic examination and what may account for practice differences.
methodsWe administered a mailed survey to a national probability sample of obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns), family medicine physicians, and advanced practice nurses specializing in obstetrics and gynecology and women's health or family medicine in 2008-2009 (N=1,196), with a response rate of 65.3%.
resultsNearly one third of ob-gyns and family medicine physicians reported always requiring a pelvic examination when prescribing oral contraception (ob-gyns 29%; family medicine 33%). A higher proportion of advanced practice nurses in primary care (45%) and a markedly lower percentage of advanced practice nurses in reproductive health (17%) reported always requiring the examination. In adjusted analyses, older clinicians were more likely to require the pelvic examination (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, P<.01) and clinicians serving a higher proportion of Medicaid patients more likely (OR 1.62, P<.05). Providers in private practice were more than twice as likely as those working in family-planning or community clinics to require pelvic examinations (OR 2.30, P<.01).
conclusionOne third of clinicians we surveyed require pelvic examinations before provision of oral contraceptives, despite guidelines indicating they are unnecessary and research suggesting they can pose a barrier to contraceptive access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.