Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21099404›Full record

ArticleCornea2011

Modulating endogenous electric currents in human corneal wounds--a novel approach of bioelectric stimulation without electrodes.

Brian Reid, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez, Mark J Mannis, Min Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cornea, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Mechanisms of Electric Signals Generated at Corneal Wounds.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Wireless-Powered Electrical Bandage Contact Lens for Facilitating Corneal Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Use of Electrotherapeutics in Ophthalmology.American journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Electrical signaling in control of ocular cell behaviors.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2012
    Review
  17. Specific ion fluxes generate cornea wound electric currents.Communicative & integrative biology · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Measurement of bioelectric current with a vibrating probe.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian ReidDermatology and Ophthalmology Research, Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Enrique O Graue-Hernandez
Mark J Mannis
Min Zhao
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Molecular Generators at Corneal Wounds Produce and regulate the Wound Electrical SignalsR01EY019101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZHAO, MIN · 2010 to 2023
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS 1R01EY019101NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo measure electric current in human corneal wounds and test the feasibility of pharmacologically enhancing the current to promote corneal wound healing.

methodsUsing a noninvasive vibrating probe, corneal electric current was measured before and after wounding of the epithelium of donated postmortem human corneas. The effects of drug aminophylline and chloride-free solution on wound current were also tested.

resultsUnwounded cornea had small outward currents (0.07 μA/cm²). Wounding increased the current more than 5 fold (0.41 μA/cm²). Monitoring the wound current over time showed that it seemed to be actively regulated and maintained above normal unwounded levels for at least 6 hours. The time course was similar to that previously measured in rat cornea. Drug treatment or chloride-free solution more than doubled the size of wound currents.

conclusionsElectric current at human corneal wounds can be significantly increased with aminophylline or chloride-free solution. Because corneal wound current directly correlates with wound healing rate, our results suggest a role for chloride-free and/or aminophylline eyedrops to enhance healing of damaged cornea in patients with reduced wound healing such as the elderly or diabetic patient. This novel approach offers bioelectric stimulation without electrodes and can be readily tested in patients.

Indexed as

Electric ConductivityAminophyllineChloridesCorneaCorneal InjuriesElectrophysiological PhenomenaEye InjuriesHumansIon-Selective ElectrodesMembrane PotentialsWound HealingAminophyllineChlorides

Identifiers

PMID21099404
PMCPMC3061552
OpenAlexW2002222550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.