Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21098663›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Salma Kaochar, Lisa Shanks, Ted Weinert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salma KaocharDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Lisa Shanks
Ted Weinert
University of Arizona · US

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM008659 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CAPALDI, ANDREW PAUL, WEINERT, TED A. · 1997 to 2019
$5.3M
Chromosome inverted fusions, dicentrics and genome instabilityR01GM076186 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI WEINERT, TED A. · 2006 to 2015
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01 GM076186NIGMS NIH HHS GM008659-11A1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076186NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic rearrangements are common, occur by largely unknown mechanisms, and can lead to human diseases. We previously demonstrated that some genome rearrangements occur in budding yeast through the fusion of two DNA sequences that contain limited sequence homology, lie in inverted orientation, and are within 5 kb of one another. This inverted repeat fusion reaction forms dicentric chromosomes, which are well-known intermediates to additional rearrangements. We have previously provided evidence indicating that an error of stalled or disrupted DNA replication forks can cause inverted repeat fusion. Here we analyze how checkpoint protein regulatory pathways known to stabilize stalled forks affect this form of instability. We find that two checkpoint pathways suppress inverted repeat fusion, and that their activities are distinguishable by their interactions with exonuclease 1 (Exo1). The checkpoint kinase Rad53 (Chk2) and recombination protein complex MRX(MRN) inhibit Exo1 in one pathway, whereas in a second pathway the ATR-like kinases Mec1 and Tel1, adaptor protein Rad9, and effector kinases Chk1 and Dun1 act independently of Exo1 to prevent inverted repeat fusion. We provide a model that indicates how in Rad53 or MRX mutants, an inappropriately active Exo1 may facilitate faulty template switching between nearby inverted repeats to form dicentric chromosomes. We further investigate the role of Rad53, using hypomorphic alleles of Rad53 and null mutations in Rad9 and Mrc1, and provide evidence that only local, as opposed to global, activity of Rad53 is sufficient to prevent inverted repeat fusion.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementGenes, cdcInverted Repeat SequencesCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2Chromosomes, FungalExodeoxyribonucleasesGenomic InstabilityHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2CHEK1 protein, humanDUN1 protein, S cerevisiaeexodeoxyribonuclease IExodeoxyribonucleasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMEC1 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTEL1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID21098663
PMCPMC3003031
OpenAlexW1986659964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.