Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21098431›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

Paintomics: a web based tool for the joint visualization of transcriptomics and metabolomics data.

Fernando García-Alcalde, Federico García-López, Joaquín Dopazo, Ana Conesa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Wheat Omics: Advancements and Opportunities.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Panomics to decode virulence and fitness in Gram-negative bacteria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernando García-AlcaldeBioinformatics and Genomics Department, Centro de Investigaciones Príncipe Felipe, Valencia, Spain.
Federico García-López
Joaquín Dopazo
Ana Conesa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe development of the omics technologies such as transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics has made possible the realization of systems biology studies where biological systems are interrogated at different levels of biochemical activity (gene expression, protein activity and/or metabolite concentration). An effective approach to the analysis of these complex datasets is the joined visualization of the disparate biomolecular data on the framework of known biological pathways.

resultsWe have developed the Paintomics web server as an easy-to-use bioinformatics resource that facilitates the integrated visual analysis of experiments where transcriptomics and metabolomics data have been measured on different conditions for the same samples. Basically, Paintomics takes complete transcriptomics and metabolomics datasets, together with lists of significant gene or metabolite changes, and paints this information on KEGG pathway maps. AVAILABILITY: Paintomics is freely available at http://www.paintomics.org.

Indexed as

SoftwareArabidopsisComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingInternetMetabolomicsSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID21098431
PMCPMC3008637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.