Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21097732›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STD & AIDS2010

Sensitivity and specificity of herpes simplex virus-2 serological assays among HIV-infected and uninfected urban Ugandans.

J Lingappa, E Nakku-Joloba, A Magaret, D Friedrich, J Dragavon, F Kambugu, M Joloba, C Whalen, R Coombs, C Celum and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative performance of the Uni-Gold™ HSV-2 Rapid: a point-of-care HSV-2 diagnostic test in unselected sera from a reference laboratory.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J LingappaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98102, USA. lingappa@uw.edu
E Nakku-Joloba
A Magaret
D Friedrich
J Dragavon
F Kambugu
M Joloba
C Whalen
R Coombs
C Celum
R Ashley Morrow

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
THE PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS OF ASYMPTOMATIC GENITAL HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUSP01AI030731 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZHU, JIA · 1991 to 2017
$34.3M
Seroprevallence /incidence of genital herpes in UgandaR01TW006672 · FIC · NEW MULAGO HOSPITAL · PI NAKKU-JOLOBA, EDITH · 2003 to 2007
$263k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW006672FIC NIH HHS R01 TW006672NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI030731NIAID NIH HHS P01AI30731-17NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is a risk factor for HIV-1 infection. We characterized HSV-2 serology assay performance in HIV-positive and HIV-negative Africans. Serostatus for HSV-2 and HIV-1 was determined in 493 serum specimens stored from a community HSV-2 prevalence survey in Kampala, Uganda. HSV-2 serology by Focus HerpeSelect ELISA, Biokit HSV-2 rapid assay and Kalon HSV-2 was compared with HSV-2 Western blot (WB) according to HIV-1 serostatus. Sensitivity/specificity was: 99.5%/70.2% for Focus, 97.0%/86.4% for Biokit and 97.5%/96.2% for Kalon. Focus with Biokit confirmation improved sensitivity/specificity (99.4%/96.8%, respectively). Use of a higher Focus index value cut-off of 2.2 instead of 1.1 increased specificity from 70.2% to 92.4%. Kalon had higher specificity than Focus (P < 0.001). Of commercially available HSV-2 serological assays, Kalon alone, or Focus ELISA followed by Biokit confirmation perform best. Improved HSV-2 assays are needed for HSV-2 and HIV-1 public health activities in Africa.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralFemaleHerpes SimplexHerpesvirus 2, HumanHIV InfectionsHumansImmunoassayMaleReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityUgandaVirologyAntibodies, ViralReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID21097732
PMCPMC3057112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.