ArticleNeuroImage2011
Speech-induced suppression of evoked auditory fields in children who stutter.
Article in NeuroImage, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07215884 (Dopamine and Sensorimotor Function in Stuttering), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dopamine and Sensorimotor Function in Stuttering
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining resting state functional connectivity and frequency power analysis in adults who stutter compared to adults who do not stutter.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- No evidence of altered language laterality in people who stutter across different brain imaging studies of speech and language.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Effect of an Auditory Temporal Training Program on Speech Fluency of Children with Developmental Stuttering.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2023Article
- Structural brain network topological alterations in stuttering adults.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Weak Vestibular Response in Persistent Developmental Stuttering.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021Article
- Speech Fluency Improvement in Developmental Stuttering Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: Insights From Available Evidence.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Article
- Neural Indices Mediating Rhyme Discrimination Differ for Some Young Children Who Stutter Regardless of Eventual Recovery or Persistence.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Speech-Induced Suppression for Delayed Auditory Feedback in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Neural Correlates of Vocal Pitch Compensation in Individuals Who Stutter.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2019Review
- Theta Modulated Neural Phase Coherence Facilitates Speech Fluency in Adults Who Stutter.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Timing variability of sensorimotor integration during vocalization in individuals who stutter.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- White matter tractography of the neural network for speech-motor control in children who stutter.Neuroscience letters · 2018Article
- Anomalous network architecture of the resting brain in children who stutter.Journal of fluency disorders · 2018Article
- Trait related sensorimotor deficits in people who stutter: An EEG investigation ofNeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Article
- Dynamic Estimation of the Auditory Temporal Response Function From MEG in Competing-Speaker Environments.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2017Article
- EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Cortical dynamics of disfluency in adults who stutter.Physiological reports · 2017Article
- Cortical activity during cued picture naming predicts individual differences in stuttering frequency.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory responses to speech sounds that are self-initiated are suppressed compared to responses to the same speech sounds during passive listening. This phenomenon is referred to as speech-induced suppression, a potentially important feedback-mediated speech-motor control process. In an earlier study, we found that both adults who do and do not stutter demonstrated a reduced amplitude of the auditory M50 and M100 responses to speech during active production relative to passive listening. It is unknown if auditory responses to self-initiated speech-motor acts are suppressed in children or if the phenomenon differs between children who do and do not stutter. As stuttering is a developmental speech disorder, examining speech-induced suppression in children may identify possible neural differences underlying stuttering close to its time of onset. We used magnetoencephalography to determine the presence of speech-induced suppression in children and to characterize the properties of speech-induced suppression in children who stutter. We examined the auditory M50 as this was the earliest robust response reproducible across our child participants and the most likely to reflect a motor-to-auditory relation. Both children who do and do not stutter demonstrated speech-induced suppression of the auditory M50. However, children who stutter had a delayed auditory M50 peak latency to vowel sounds compared to children who do not stutter indicating a possible deficiency in their ability to efficiently integrate auditory speech information for the purpose of establishing neural representations of speech sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.