Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21094887›Full record

ReviewProgress in brain research2010

Genetic and epigenetic underpinnings of sex differences in the brain and in neurological and psychiatric disease susceptibility.

Irfan A Qureshi, Mark F Mehler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On the importance of including both sexes in animal studies - insights from home-cage monitoring.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irfan A QureshiRosyln and Leslie Goldstein Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Mark F Mehler
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Mechanisms Regulating Astroglial Lineage DevelopmentR01MH066290 · NIMH · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI MEHLER, MARK F · 2002 to 2006
$1.8M
Neurodegenerative Diseases: A New Class of Primary Developmental Disorders?R01NS071571 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI MEHLER, MARK F · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
REGULATION OF POSTNATAL CORTICAL MULTIPOTENT PROGENITORSR01NS038902 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI MEHLER, MARK F · 1999 to 2002
$886k
NIMH NIH HHS MH66290NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066290NINDS NIH HHS NS071571NINDS NIH HHS NS38902NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038902NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are numerous examples of sex differences in brain and behavior and in susceptibility to a broad range of brain diseases. For example, gene expression is sexually dimorphic during brain development, adult life, and aging. These differences are orchestrated by the interplay between genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences. However, the molecular mechanisms that underpin these differences have not been fully elucidated. Because recent studies have highlighted the key roles played by epigenetic processes in regulating gene expression and mediating brain form and function, this chapter reviews emerging evidence that shows how epigenetic mechanisms including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are responsible for promoting sexual dimorphism in the brain. Differential profiles of DNA methylation and histone modifications are found in dimorphic brain regions such as the hypothalamus as a result of sex hormone exposure during developmental critical periods. The elaboration of specific epigenetic marks is also linked with regulating sex hormone signaling pathways later in life. Furthermore, the expression and function of epigenetic factors such as the methyl-CpG-binding protein, MeCP2, and the histone-modifying enzymes, UTX and UTY, are sexually dimorphic in the brain. ncRNAs are also implicated in promoting sex differences. For example, X inactivation-specific transcript (XIST) is a long ncRNA that mediates X chromosome inactivation, a seminal developmental process that is particularly important in brain. These observations imply that understanding epigenetic mechanisms, which regulate dimorphic gene expression and function, is necessary for developing a more comprehensive view of sex differences in brain. These emerging findings also suggest that epigenetic mechanisms are, in part, responsible for the differential susceptibility between males and females that is characteristic of a spectrum of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDisease SusceptibilityDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAdultBrain DiseasesFemaleHistone DemethylasesHistonesHumansHypothalamusMaleMental DisordersMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2Minor Histocompatibility AntigensHistone DemethylasesHistonesKDM6A protein, humanMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2Minor Histocompatibility AntigensNuclear ProteinsRNA, UntranslatedUTY protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21094887
PMCPMC4465286
OpenAlexW1566560256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.