Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21094724›Full record

ReviewDental clinics of North America2011

Saliva as a diagnostic fluid.

Daniel Malamud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dental clinics of North America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 203 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Potential of Salivary Biomarkers in Autism Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel MalamudDepartment of Basic Sciences, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA. daniel.malamud@nyu.edu

Funding

Point Detection of Pathogens in Oral Samples via UPTU01DE017855 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MALAMUD, DANIEL · 2006 to 2010
$7.9M
The Proteomic and Functional Profile of HIV Positive SalivaU19DE018385 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MALAMUD, DANIEL · 2007 to 2014
$6.6M
Point Detection of Pathogens in Oral Samples via UPTU01DE014964 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MALAMUD, DANIEL · 2002 to 2005
$4.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE14964NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE014964NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE017855NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE018385NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE18385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salivary diagnostics is a dynamic and emerging field utilizing nanotechnology and molecular diagnostics to aid in the diagnosis of oral and systemic diseases. In this article the author critically reviews the latest advances using oral biomarkers for disease detection. The use of oral fluids is broadening perspectives in clinical diagnosis, disease monitoring, and decision making for patient care. Important elements determining the future possibilities and challenges in this field are also discussed.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresHumansSalivaSalivary Proteins and PeptidesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersSalivary Proteins and Peptides

Identifiers

PMID21094724
PMCPMC3011946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.