Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21093921›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2011

A standardized grading system for scleritis.

H Nida Sen, Amit A Sangave, Debra A Goldstein, Eric B Suhler, Denise Cunningham, Susan Vitale, Robert B Nussenblatt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03465111 (An Open Label, Multi-centered, Randomized Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Bioactivity of Subcutaneous ACTH GeL in PAtients With Scleritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03465111 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

An Open Label, Multi-centered, Randomized Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Bioactivity of Subcutaneous ACTH GeL in PAtients With Scleritis: The ATLAS Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMetropolitan Eye Research & Surgery InstituteRan2019 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsScleritisArmsACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) gel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Wide-field fluorescein angiography findings in active anterior scleritis.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical patterns and risk factors in scleritis: a multicentric study in Colombia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

H Nida SenNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. senh@nei.nih.gov
Amit A Sangave
Debra A Goldstein
Eric B Suhler
Denise Cunningham
Susan Vitale
Robert B Nussenblatt
National Eye Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI YAO, XINCHENG · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
Uveitis and Ocular Immunology FellowshipZIEEY000482 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI KODATI, SHILPA · 2009 to 2022
$4.6M
Diagnosis And Treatment Of Ocular Inflammatory Disease (uveitis)ZIAEY000356 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI SEN, HATICE · 2009 to 2016
$2.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIE EY000482NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated the performance of a standardized grading system for scleritis using standard digital photographs.

designCross-sectional interobserver agreement study.

participantsPhoto archives from the National Eye Institute.

methodsThree uveitis specialists from 3 different centers graded 79 randomly arranged images of the sclera with various degrees of inflammation. Grading was done using standard screen resolution (1024×768 pixels) on a 0 to 4+ scale in 2 sessions: (1) without using reference photographs and (2) with reference to a set of standard photographs (proposed grading system). The graders were masked to the order of images, and the order of images was randomized. Interobserver agreement in grading the severity of inflammation with and without the use of grading system was evaluated.

main outcome measuresInterobserver agreement.

resultsThe proposed grading system for assessing activity in scleritis demonstrated a good interobserver agreement. Interobserver agreement (pooled κ) was poor (0.289) without photographic guidance and improved substantially when the "grading system" with standardized photographs was used (κ = 0.603).

conclusionsThis system of standardized images for scleritis grading provides significantly more consistent grading of scleral inflammation in this study and has clear applications in clinical settings and clinical research.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexCross-Sectional StudiesHumansObserver VariationPhotographyScleritis

Identifiers

PMID21093921
PMCPMC3070789
OpenAlexW1965202208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.