ArticleCancer cell international2010
Identification and validation of genes involved in gastric tumorigenesis.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- CXCL5: A coachman to drive cancer progression.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- ITPG: an immune-related transcriptomic predictive model for gastric cancer prognosis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Identification and verification of SPP1 in anoikis as a prognostic biomarker for intestinal metaplasia and gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in protein microarray-based proteomics for gastric cancer applications in biomarker discovery, molecular subtyping, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Upregulation of spondin-2 indicates poorer clinical outcomes and induces radioresistance in gastric cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Combination detection of IgG- and IgA-related autoantibodies for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Article
- Whole exome sequencing reveals aniMetaOmics · 2025Article
- Transmembrane Prostate Androgen-Induced Protein 1 Molecular Modeling and Refinement Using Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Sine oculis homeobox homolog family function in gastrointestinal cancer: Progression and comprehensive analysis.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- TGFB1/CXCL5 axis regulation by LCN2 overexpression: a promising strategy to inhibit colorectal cancer metastasis and enhance prognosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Unlocking ESCC Progression: CCL15-CCR1 Axis Activates AKT/ERK1/2/c-Jun/CDK2 Pathway.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Aldo-keto Reductase 1B10 Restrains Cell Migration, Invasion, and Adhesion of Gastric Cancer via Regulating Integrin Subunit Alpha 5.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Network and functional analyses of differentially expressed genes in gastric cancer provide new biomarkers associated with disease pathogenesis.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Retinal determination gene networks: from biological functions to therapeutic strategies.Biomarker research · 2023Review
- The biological functions and related signaling pathways of SPON2.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- A Novel Prognostic Marker and Therapeutic Target Associated with Glioma Progression in a Tumor Immune Microenvironment.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Article
- The Role of CXC Chemokines in Cancer Progression.Cancers · 2022Review
- Simulated Microgravity Influences Immunity-Related Biomarkers in Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The role of roof plate-specific spondins in liver homeostasis and disease.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2022Review
- Identification and validation of plasma biomarkers for diagnosis of breast cancer in South Asian women.Scientific reports · 2022Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer is one of the common cancers seen in south India. Unfortunately more than 90% are advanced by the time they report to a tertiary centre in the country. There is an urgent need to characterize these cancers and try to identify potential biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used 24 gastric cancers, 20 Paired normal (PN) and 5 apparently normal gastric tissues obtained from patients with non-gastric cancers (Apparently normal - AN) for the microarray study followed by validation of the significant genes (n = 63) by relative quantitation using Taqman Low Density Array Real Time PCR. We then used a custom made Quantibody protein array to validate the expression of 15 proteins in gastric tissues (4 AN, 9 PN and 9 gastric cancers). The same array format was used to study the plasma levels of these proteins in 58 patients with gastric cancers and 18 from patients with normal/non-malignant gastric conditions.
resultsSeventeen genes (ASPN, CCL15/MIP-1δ, MMP3, SPON2, PRSS2, CCL3, TMEPAI/PMEPAI, SIX3, MFNG, SOSTDC1, SGNE1, SST, IGHA1, AKR1B10, FCGBP, ATP4B, NCAPH2) were shown to be differentially expressed between the tumours and the paired normal, for the first time. EpCAM (p = 0.0001), IL8 (p = 0.0003), CCL4/MIP-1β (p = 0.0026), CCL20/MIP-3α (p = 0.039) and TIMP1 (p = 0.0017) tissue protein levels were significantly different (Mann Whitney U test) between tumours versus AN & PN. In addition, median plasma levels of IL8, CXCL9/MIG, CCL3/MIP-1α, CCL20/MIP-3α, PDGFR-B and TIMP1 proteins were significantly different between the non-malignant group and the gastric cancer group. The post-surgical levels of EpCAM, IGFBP3, IL8, CXCL10/IP10, CXCL9/MIG, CCL3/MIP-1α, CCL20/MIP-3α, SPP1/OPN and PDGFR-B showed a uniform drop in all the samples studied.
conclusionsOur study has identified several genes differentially expressed in gastric cancers, some for the first time. Some of these have been confirmed at the protein level, as well. Some of these proteins will need to be evaluated further for their potential as diagnostic biomarkers in gastric cancers and some could be useful as follow-up markers in gastric cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.