Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21092270›Full record

Trial reportRespiratory research2010

Oral tolerance inhibits pulmonary eosinophilia in a cockroach allergen induced model of asthma: a randomized laboratory study.

Louis J Vaickus, Jacqueline Bouchard, Jiyoun Kim, Sudha Natarajan, Daniel G Remick

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respiratory research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Eosinophilic inflammation in allergic asthma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cockroach allergens induce biphasic asthma-like pulmonary inflammation in outbred mice.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2012
    Article
  9. Bed bugs: clinical relevance and control options.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louis J VaickusBoston University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacqueline Bouchard
Jiyoun Kim
Sudha Natarajan
Daniel G Remick
Boston University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007309 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI GUMMULURU, SURYARAM · 1988 to 2024
$7.4M
Endotoxin, allergens and pollutants in asthmaR01ES013538 · NIEHS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI REMICK, DANIEL G. · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS 2T32AI007309-21A1NIEHS NIH HHS 5R01ES013538-04NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntigen desensitization through oral tolerance is becoming an increasingly attractive treatment option for allergic diseases. However, the mechanism(s) by which tolerization is achieved remain poorly defined. In this study we endeavored to induce oral tolerance to cockroach allergen (CRA: a complex mixture of insect components) in order to ameliorate asthma-like, allergic pulmonary inflammation.

methodsWe compared the pulmonary inflammation of mice which had received four CRA feedings prior to intratracheal allergen sensitization and challenge to mice fed PBS on the same time course. Respiratory parameters were assessed by whole body unrestrained plethysmography and mechanical ventilation with forced oscillation. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and lung homogenate (LH) were assessed for cytokines and chemokines by ELISA. BAL inflammatory cells were also collected and examined by light microscopy.

resultsCRA feeding prior to allergen sensitization and challenge led to a significant improvement in respiratory health. Airways hyperreactivity measured indirectly via enhanced pause (Penh) was meaningfully reduced in the CRA-fed mice compared to the PBS fed mice (2.3 ± 0.4 vs 3.9 ± 0.6; p = 0.03). Directly measured airways resistance confirmed this trend when comparing the CRA-fed to the PBS-fed animals (2.97 ± 0.98 vs 4.95 ± 1.41). This effect was not due to reduced traditional inflammatory cell chemotactic factors, Th2 or other cytokines and chemokines. The mechanism of improved respiratory health in the tolerized mice was due to significantly reduced eosinophil numbers in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (43300 ± 11445 vs 158786 ± 38908; p = 0.007) and eosinophil specific peroxidase activity in the lung homogenate (0.59 ± 0.13 vs 1.19 ± 0.19; p = 0.017). The decreased eosinophilia was likely the result of increased IL-10 in the lung homogenate of the tolerized mice (6320 ± 354 ng/mL vs 5190 ± 404 ng/mL, p = 0.02).

conclusionOur results show that oral tolerization to CRA can improve the respiratory health of experimental mice in a CRA-induced model of asthma-like pulmonary inflammation by reducing pulmonary eosinophilia.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAllergensAnimalsAsthmaCockroachesDrug ToleranceFemaleHumansMicePulmonary EosinophiliaAllergens

Identifiers

PMID21092270
PMCPMC3016351
OpenAlexW2160566045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.