Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21092261›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2010

How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Klaus Linde, Karin Niemann, Antonius Schneider, Karin Meissner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02746497 (The Efficacy of ACupuncture On Menopausal Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
37.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02746497 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of ACupuncture On Menopausal Symptoms (ACOM): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2016 to 2017Enrolled70ConditionsMenopauseArmsAcupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acupuncture for Chronic Pain Management in Haemophilic Arthropathy: A Systematic Review.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Acupuncture for symptomatic gastroparesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  11. Acupuncture for the prevention of tension-type headache.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaus LindeInstitute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Orleansstrasse 47, D-81667 Munich, Germany. klaus.linde@lrz.tum.de
Karin Niemann
Antonius Schneider
Karin Meissner
Technical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile several recent large randomized trials found clinically relevant effects of acupuncture over no treatment or routine care, blinded trials comparing acupuncture to sham interventions often reported only minor or no differences. This raises the question whether (sham) acupuncture is associated with particularly potent nonspecific effects. We aimed to investigate the size of nonspecific effects associated with acupuncture interventions.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials and reference lists were searched up to April 2010 to identify randomized trials of acupuncture for any condition, including both sham and no acupuncture control groups. Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second. Pooled standardized mean differences were calculated using a random effects model with the inverse variance method.

resultsThirty-seven trials with a total of 5754 patients met the inclusion criteria. The included studies varied strongly regarding patients, interventions, outcome measures, methodological quality and effect sizes reported. Among the 32 trials reporting a continuous outcome measure, the random effects standardized mean difference between sham acupuncture and no acupuncture groups was -0.45 (95% confidence interval, -0.57, -0.34; I2 = 54%; Egger's test for funnel plot asymmetry, P = 0.25). Trials with larger effects of sham over no acupuncture reported smaller effects of acupuncture over sham intervention than trials with smaller nonspecific effects (β = -0.39, P = 0.029).

conclusionsSham acupuncture interventions are often associated with moderately large nonspecific effects which could make it difficult to detect small additional specific effects. Compared to inert placebo interventions, effects associated with sham acupuncture might be larger, which would have considerable implications for the design and interpretation of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21092261
PMCPMC3001416
OpenAlexW2033733244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.