Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21092232›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Bioinformatic analysis of ESTs collected by Sanger and pyrosequencing methods for a keystone forest tree species: oak.

Saneyoshi Ueno, Grégoire Le Provost, Valérie Léger, Christophe Klopp, Céline Noirot, Jean-Marc Frigerio, Franck Salin, Jérôme Salse, Michael Abrouk, Florent Murat and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multiomics Molecular Research into the Recalcitrant and OrphanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Red Clover (Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High-density linkage mapping and distribution of segregation distortion regions in the oak genome.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Saneyoshi UenoINRA, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, 69 route d'Arcachon, F-33612 Cestas, France.
Grégoire Le Provost
Valérie Léger
Christophe Klopp
Céline Noirot
Jean-Marc Frigerio
Franck Salin
Jérôme Salse
Michael Abrouk
Florent Murat
Oliver Brendel
Jérémy Derory
Pierre Abadie
Patrick Léger
Cyril Cabane
Aurélien Barré
Antoine de Daruvar
Arnaud Couloux
Patrick Wincker
Marie-Pierre Reviron
Antoine Kremer
Christophe Plomion
CEA CESTA · FRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Fagaceae family comprises about 1,000 woody species worldwide. About half belong to the Quercus family. These oaks are often a source of raw material for biomass wood and fiber. Pedunculate and sessile oaks, are among the most important deciduous forest tree species in Europe. Despite their ecological and economical importance, very few genomic resources have yet been generated for these species. Here, we describe the development of an EST catalogue that will support ecosystem genomics studies, where geneticists, ecophysiologists, molecular biologists and ecologists join their efforts for understanding, monitoring and predicting functional genetic diversity.

resultsWe generated 145,827 sequence reads from 20 cDNA libraries using the Sanger method. Unexploitable chromatograms and quality checking lead us to eliminate 19,941 sequences. Finally a total of 125,925 ESTs were retained from 111,361 cDNA clones. Pyrosequencing was also conducted for 14 libraries, generating 1,948,579 reads, from which 370,566 sequences (19.0%) were eliminated, resulting in 1,578,192 sequences. Following clustering and assembly using TGICL pipeline, 1,704,117 EST sequences collapsed into 69,154 tentative contigs and 153,517 singletons, providing 222,671 non-redundant sequences (including alternative transcripts). We also assembled the sequences using MIRA and PartiGene software and compared the three unigene sets. Gene ontology annotation was then assigned to 29,303 unigene elements. Blast search against the SWISS-PROT database revealed putative homologs for 32,810 (14.7%) unigene elements, but more extensive search with Pfam, Refseq_protein, Refseq_RNA and eight gene indices revealed homology for 67.4% of them. The EST catalogue was examined for putative homologs of candidate genes involved in bud phenology, cuticle formation, phenylpropanoids biosynthesis and cell wall formation. Our results suggest a good coverage of genes involved in these traits. Comparative orthologous sequences (COS) with other plant gene models were identified and allow to unravel the oak paleo-history. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were searched, resulting in 52,834 SSRs and 36,411 SNPs. All of these are available through the Oak Contig Browser http://genotoul-contigbrowser.toulouse.inra.fr:9092/Quercus_robur/index.html.

conclusionsThis genomic resource provides a unique tool to discover genes of interest, study the oak transcriptome, and develop new markers to investigate functional diversity in natural populations.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsTemperatureBase SequenceCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyContig MappingGene LibraryGenes, PlantMicrosatellite RepeatsPeptidesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuercusRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSoftwarePeptidesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21092232
PMCPMC3017864
OpenAlexW2123211219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.