Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21092103›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2010

Phylogenetic relationships in genus Arachis based on ITS and 5.8S rDNA sequences.

Marcelo D Bechara, Márcio C Moretzsohn, Darío A Palmieri, Jomar P Monteiro, Maurício Bacci, Joaquim Martins, José F M Valls, Catalina R Lopes, Marcos A Gimenes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chromosomal variations and evolution in Arachis species revealed by single-copy FISH karyotyping.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Seed protein fraction electrophoresis in peanut (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genomic characterisation ofComparative cytogenetics · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcelo D BecharaUniversidade de Marília, UNIMAR - Marília, SP, Brazil.
Márcio C Moretzsohn
Darío A Palmieri
Jomar P Monteiro
Maurício Bacci
Joaquim Martins
José F M Valls
Catalina R Lopes
Marcos A Gimenes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genus Arachis comprises 80 species and it is subdivided into nine taxonomic sections (Arachis, Caulorrhizae, Erectoides, Extranervosae, Heteranthae, Procumbentes, Rhizomatosae, Trierectoides, and Triseminatae). This genus is naturally confined to South America and most of its species are native to Brazil. In order to provide a better understanding of the evolution of the genus, we reconstructed the phylogeny of 45 species using the variation observed on nucleotide sequences in internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS1 and ITS2) and 5.8 S of nuclear ribosomal DNA.

resultsIntraspecific variation was detected, but in general it was not enough to place accessions of the same species in different clades. Our data support the view that Arachis is a monophyletic group and suggested Heteranthae as the most primitive section of genus Arachis. The results confirmed the circumscriptions of some sections (Caulorrhizae, Extranervosae), but raised questions about others. Sections Erectoides, Trierectoides and Procumbentes were not well defined, while sections Arachis and Rhizomatosae seem to include species that could be moved to different sections. The division of section Arachis into A and B genome species was also observed in the phylogenetic tree and these two groups of species may not have a monophyletic origin. The 2n = 2x = 18 species of section Arachis (A. praecox, A. palustris and A. decora) were all placed in the same clade, indicating they are closely related to each other, and their genomes are more related to B genome than to the A genome. Data also allowed insights on the origin of tetraploid A. glabrata, suggesting rhizome appeared twice within the genus and raising questions about the placement of that species in section Rhizomatosae.

conclusionThe main clades established in this study in general agreed with many other studies that have used other types of evidences and sets of species, being some of them included in our study and some not. Thus, the relationships established can be a useful framework for future systematic reviews of genus Arachis and for the selection of species to pre-breeding programs.

Indexed as

PhylogenyArachisDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerGenetic VariationPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8SSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S

Identifiers

PMID21092103
PMCPMC3095334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.