Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21091424›Full record

ReviewCurrent molecular medicine2010

The retinal pigment epithelium in health and disease.

J R Sparrow, D Hicks, C P Hamel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current molecular medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 357 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
357citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

357 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Ophthalmologic Comorbidities in Alopecia Areata.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

297 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J R SparrowDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. jrs88@columbia.edu
D Hicks
C P Hamel

Funding

IMPACT OF LIPOFUSCIN IN RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIAL CELLSR01EY012951 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SPARROW, JANET RUTHE · 2000 to 2024
$8.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPE) constitute a simple layer of cuboidal cells that are strategically situated behind the photoreceptor (PR) cells. The inconspicuousness of this monolayer contrasts sharply with its importance [1]. The relationship between the RPE and PR cells is crucial to sight; this is evident from basic and clinical studies demonstrating that primary dysfunctioning of the RPE can result in visual cell death and blindness. RPE cells carry out many functions including the conversion and storage of retinoid, the phagocytosis of shed PR outer segment membrane, the absorption of scattered light, ion and fluid transport and RPE-PR apposition. The magnitude of the demands imposed on this single layer of cells in order to execute these tasks, will become apparent to the reader of this review as will the number of clinical disorders that take origin from these cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBruch MembraneHumansLipofuscinPhagocytosisRetinal DiseasesRetinal Pigment EpitheliumRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsVitreoretinopathy, ProliferativeLipofuscin

Identifiers

PMID21091424
PMCPMC4120883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.