Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21090891›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)2010

Bitter avoidance in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and mice (Mus musculus and Peromyscus leucopus).

Kristin L Field, Gary K Beauchamp, Bruce A Kimball, Julie A Mennella, Alexander A Bachmanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Taste of Caffeine.Journal of caffeine research · 2017
    Review
  4. Genetics of taste receptors.Current pharmaceutical design · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristin L FieldMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Gary K Beauchamp
Bruce A Kimball
Julie A Mennella
Alexander A Bachmanov

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN THE CHEMICAL SENSEST32DC000014 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI PAMELA HELEN DALTON, Joel D Mainland · 1989 to 2026
$6.2M
MODIFICATION OF SALT TASTER01DC000882 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI BACHMANOV, ALEXANDER A · 1990 to 2013
$4.7M
MODEL FOR SENSITIVE PERIODS IN EARLY FLAVOR LEARNINGR01HD037119 · NICHD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MENNELLA, JULIA ANNE · 1999 to 2016
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037119NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD37119NIDCD NIH HHS 2 T32 DC 00014NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000882NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rejection of bitter substances is common in many species and may function to protect an animal from ingestion of bitter-tasting toxins. Since many plants are bitter, it has been proposed that high tolerance for bitterness would be adaptive for herbivores. Earlier studies conducted on herbivorous guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) have been used to support this proposal. We tested guinea pigs with bitter plant secondary metabolites (salicin, caffeine, quinine hydrochloride) and bitter protein hydrolysates (two types of hydrolyzed casein, hydrolyzed soy) in a series of two-choice preference tests. For comparison, we tested two nonherbivorous mouse species (Mus musculus and Peromyscus leucopus). Guinea pigs did show weaker avoidance of quinine hydrochloride than did the mice, confirming predictions generated from earlier work. However, guinea pigs had similar responses to caffeine as did Peromyscus. Both of these species showed weaker avoidance responses than Mus to 10 mM caffeine. For salicin, guinea pigs were the only species to avoid it at 10 mM and their preference scores at this concentration were significantly lower than for the two mice species. Guinea pigs avoided all of the protein hydrolysates more strongly than the other species. Responses to the protein hydrolysates did not reflect the patterns observed with the simple bitter compounds, suggesting that other properties of these complex stimuli may be responsible for guinea pig avoidance of them. Our results suggest caution in accepting, without further empirical support, the premise that guinea pigs (and herbivores in general) have a generalized reduced bitter sensitivity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvoidance LearningGuinea PigsMicePeromyscusSpecies SpecificityTaste PerceptionTaste Threshold

Identifiers

PMID21090891
PMCPMC2999000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.