Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21088959›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2011

Peripheral biomarkers of cognitive response to dopamine receptor agonist treatment.

Karen D Ersche, Jonathan P Roiser, Mark Lucas, Enrico Domenici, Trevor W Robbins, Edward T Bullmore

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dopamine agonists for the treatment of cocaine dependence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Beta-Blocker Propranolol Modulates Decision Urgency During Sequential Information Gathering.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Trial
  4. Dopamine effects on evidence gathering and integration.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2015
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biomarkers of Major Depressive Disorder: Knowing is Half the Battle.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  14. Multimodal investigation of dopamine DNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Protein biomarkers of mood disorders.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen D ErscheDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building for Brain and Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK. ke220@cam.ac.uk
Jonathan P Roiser
Mark Lucas
Enrico Domenici
Trevor W Robbins
Edward T Bullmore
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBGlaxoSmithKline (Italy) · ITUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G0701497Medical Research Council G1000183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleUsing biological markers to objectively measure addiction severity or to identify individuals who might benefit most from pro-cognitive treatment could potentially revolutionize neuropsychopharmacology. We investigated the use of dopamine receptor mRNA levels in circulating blood cells as predictors of cognitive response following dopamine agonist treatment, and as biomarkers of the severity of stimulant drug dependence. METHODOLOGY: We employed a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over design, administering a single dose of the selective dopamine D(2/3) receptor agonist pramipexole (0.5 mg) to increase dopamine transmission in one session and a placebo treatment in another session in 36 volunteers. Half the volunteers had a formal diagnosis of stimulant dependence, while half had no psychiatric history. Participants performed neurocognitive tests from the CANTAB battery on both occasions, and stimulant-dependent individuals rated drug craving using visual analog scales. Whole-blood mRNA levels were measured for three dopamine-related genes: DRD3 and DRD4 (dopamine receptors), and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT; a dopamine catabolic enzyme).

resultsStimulant users performed worse than healthy volunteers on the cognitive tests. The variation in peripheral dopamine D(3) receptor mRNA expression explained over one quarter of the variation in response to pramipexole on the spatial working memory test across all participants. The severity of stimulant dependence was also significantly associated with peripheral COMT mRNA expression in stimulant users.

conclusionsPeripheral expression of dopamine-related genes may be useful as a biomarker of cognitive response to dopamine agonist drugs and of severity of addiction to dopamine-releasing stimulant drugs.

Indexed as

AdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersBenzothiazolesBiomarkersCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCocaine-Related DisordersCognitionCross-Over StudiesDopamine AgonistsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsBenzothiazolesBiomarkersCatechol O-MethyltransferaseDopamine AgonistsDRD3 protein, humanDRD4 protein, humanPramipexoleProlactinReceptors, Dopamine D3Receptors, Dopamine D4RNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21088959
PMCPMC3063549
OpenAlexW2130929146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.