Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21088867›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology letters2011

Aspergillus as a multi-purpose cell factory: current status and perspectives.

Vera Meyer, Bo Wu, Arthur F J Ram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology letters, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Production of L-Malic Acid by Metabolically EngineeredJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Large-Scale Production of Anti-RNase A VHH Expressed inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Identification ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vera MeyerDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Leiden University, Institute of Biology Leiden, Sylviusweg 72, 2333 BE, Leiden, The Netherlands. v.meyer@biology.leidenuniv.nl
Bo Wu
Arthur F J Ram

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aspergilli have a long history in biotechnology as expression platforms for the production of food ingredients, pharmaceuticals and enzymes. The achievements made during the last years, however, have the potential to revolutionize Aspergillus biotechnology and to assure Aspergillus a dominant place among microbial cell factories. This mini-review will highlight most recent breakthroughs in fundamental and applied Aspergillus research with a focus on new molecular tools, techniques and products. New trends and concepts related to Aspergillus genomics and systems biology will be discussed as well as the challenges that have to be met to integrate omics data with metabolic engineering attempts.

Indexed as

AspergillusBiotechnologyGenetic EngineeringGenomicsSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID21088867
PMCPMC3040820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.