Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21088837›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2011

Simplified alternative to the TRISS method for resource-constrained settings.

Shinji Nakahara, Masao Ichikawa, Akio Kimura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The development of simple survival prediction models for blunt trauma victims treated at Asian emergency centers.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2012
    Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shinji NakaharaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216-8511, Japan. snakahara@marianna-u.ac.jp
Masao Ichikawa
Akio Kimura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe developed simple methods of risk adjustment for evaluating the quality of injury care (predicting survival probabilities of the injured) by fully utilizing routinely collected data in injury surveillance and clinical practices. Widely used methods of risk adjustment require additional data that are difficult to collect in resource-constrained settings.

methodsWe developed logistic regression models that predict survival using data obtained from 9,840 victims aged 15 years or older with blunt traumatic injuries who were registered in the Japan Trauma Data Bank, Japan's national trauma registry, between January 2004 and December 2007. The models included three predictors: age, an anatomical injury severity parameter such as a simplified severity categorization (minor, moderate, and severe) described in the Injury Surveillance Guidelines, and a physiological status parameter. The models' abilities to predict survival probabilities were evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROCC).

resultsThe simplified three-predictor models showed good performance with the AUROCC ranging from 0.86 to 0.94. In particular, the models with a consciousness level indicator as a physiological parameter showed a high AUROCC, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94, which was not much different from the performance of the widely used method that shows an AUROCC of 0.96.

conclusionsSimplified methods of risk adjustment that require only routinely collected data will facilitate evaluation and improvement in the quality of injury care in resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries, where injuries are a growing public health concern.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathTrauma Severity IndicesAdolescentAdultAge FactorsFemaleHospital MortalityHumansJapanLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsQuality ImprovementRegistriesRisk Adjustment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.