Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21088584›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychiatry2011

Response to treatment in bipolar disorder.

Cristiana Cruceanu, Martin Alda, Guy Rouleau, Gustavo Turecki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Omics-Based Biomarkers: Application of Metabolomics in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular actions and clinical pharmacogenetics of lithium therapy.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristiana CruceanuMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Martin Alda
Guy Rouleau
Gustavo Turecki

Funding

CIHR 64410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBipolar disorder is a complex psychiatric condition that has been shown to carry a great degree of genetic loading. This review addresses current research in the genetics of treatment response in bipolar disorder, with a focus on findings that have shaped our understanding of the changing direction of this field in light of recent technological advancements. RECENT

findingsThe recent publications in bipolar disorder treatment response have helped consolidate or improve upon knowledge of susceptibility loci and genes in the field. There seems to be an increasing trend toward functionally assessing the role played by putative candidate genes and molecular factors modulating expression in bipolar disorder, as well as a movement toward more global, pathway and genome-wide-oriented research. SUMMARY: Genetic and molecular research to date in bipolar disorder treatment response has not completely answered all the lingering questions in the field, but has contributed to the development of a more patient-based understanding of treatment. In order to apply these findings at a clinical level, more comprehensive treatment response studies are imperative, combining recent advances in high-throughput genomics with functional molecular research.

Indexed as

Antimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderGene Expression RegulationGenetic Association StudiesGenetic LinkageGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLithium CompoundsSignal TransductionTreatment OutcomeAntimanic AgentsLithium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID21088584
PMCPMC3478324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.