ArticleCirculation research2010
Myocyte turnover in the aging human heart.
Article in Circulation research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 121 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
121 citing papers in PubMed, 286 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex Influences the Safety and Therapeutic Efficacy of Cardiac Nanomedicine Technologies.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Article
- Sex-specific differences in risk factors, comorbidities, diagnostic challenges, optimal management, and prognostic outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A comprehensive literature review.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Identifying sex similarities and differences in structure and function of the sinoatrial node in the mouse heart.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Zinc's protective role against hydroxychloroquine-induced cardiac effects in adult male albino rats.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2023Article
- What have we learned so far from the sex/gender issue in heart failure? An overview of current evidence.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Review
- Neuregulin-1, a potential therapeutic target for cardiac repair.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in humans and mice: embracing clinical complexity in mouse models.European heart journal · 2021Review
- Stem cell therapies in cardiac diseases: Current status and future possibilities.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
- 3D bioprinting in cardiac tissue engineering.Theranostics · 2021Review
- Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Aging and Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Harnessing Mechanosensation in Next Generation Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- Sex differences and the left ventricle: morphology matters.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2020Article
- Sex and Gender Differences in Heart Failure.International journal of heart failure · 2020Review
- Bioprinting Approaches to Engineering Vascularized 3D Cardiac Tissues.Current cardiology reports · 2019Review
- Tetraploidy in cancer and its possible link to aging.Cancer science · 2018Review
- Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2018Review
- Senescent cells: a therapeutic target for cardiovascular disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2018Review
- Concise Review: Is Cardiac Cell Therapy Dead? Embarrassing Trial Outcomes and New Directions for the Future.Stem cells translational medicine · 2018Review
- The current status and future of cardiac stem/progenitor cell therapy for congenital heart defects from diabetic pregnancy.Pediatric research · 2018Review
- Chasing c-Kit through the heart: Taking a broader view.Pharmacological research · 2018Review
61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2018-12-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Investigation by Company/Institution · Misconduct - Official Investigation(s) and/or Finding(s) · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) ·
- Expression of concern · 2018-11-20Concerns/Issues about Data · Investigation by Company/Institution · Misconduct - Official Investigation(s) and/or Finding(s) · Updated to Retraction ·
- Commented on by
- Expression of concern
- Expression of concern
- Retracted
Authors and funding
18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleThe turnover of cardiomyocytes in the aging female and male heart is currently unknown, emphasizing the need to define human myocardial biology.
objectiveThe effects of age and gender on the magnitude of myocyte regeneration and the origin of newly formed cardiomyocytes were determined. METHODS AND
resultsThe interaction of myocyte replacement, cellular senescence, growth inhibition, and apoptosis was measured in normal female (n=32) and male (n=42) human hearts collected from patients 19 to 104 years of age who died from causes other than cardiovascular diseases. A progressive loss of telomeric DNA in human cardiac stem cells (hCSCs) occurs with aging and the newly formed cardiomyocytes inherit short telomeres and rapidly reach the senescent phenotype. Our data provide novel information on the superior ability of the female heart to sustain the multiple variables associated with the development of the senescent myopathy. At all ages, the female heart is equipped with a larger pool of functionally competent hCSCs and younger myocytes than the male myocardium. The replicative potential is higher and telomeres are longer in female hCSCs than in male hCSCs. In the female heart, myocyte turnover occurs at a rate of 10%, 14%, and 40% per year at 20, 60, and 100 years of age, respectively. Corresponding values in the male heart are 7%, 12%, and 32% per year, documenting that cardiomyogenesis involves a large and progressively increasing number of parenchymal cells with aging. From 20 to 100 years of age, the myocyte compartment is replaced 15 times in women and 11 times in men.
conclusionsThe human heart is a highly dynamic organ regulated by a pool of resident hCSCs that modulate cardiac homeostasis and condition organ aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.