Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21087929›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

The intra-S phase checkpoint protein Tof1 collaborates with the helicase Rrm3 and the F-box protein Dia2 to maintain genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Narendra K Bairwa, Bidyut K Mohanty, Radostina Stamenova, M Joan Curcio, Deepak Bastia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic interaction between RLM1 and F-box motif encoding gene SAF1 contributes to stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacterial and Eukaryotic Replisome Machines.JSM biochemistry and molecular biology · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Narendra K BairwaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
Bidyut K Mohanty
Radostina Stamenova
M Joan Curcio
Deepak Bastia
Medical University of South Carolina · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · USWadsworth Center · US

Funding

MECHANISM OF TERMINATION OF DNA REPLICATIONR01GM049264 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BASTIA, DEEPAK · 1994 to 2010
$3.6M
REGULATION OF RETROTRANSPOSITION IN S. CEREVISIAER01GM052072 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI CURCIO, M JOAN · 2000 to 2013
$3.3M
REGULATION OF RETROTRANSPOSITION IN S CEREVISIAER29GM052072 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI CURCIO, M JOAN · 1995 to 1999
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM049264NIGMS NIH HHS GM049264-17S1NIGMS NIH HHS GM52072NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049264NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052072NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM052072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intra-S phase checkpoint protein complex Tof1/Csm3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae antagonizes Rrm3 helicase to modulate replication fork arrest not only at the replication termini of rDNA but also at strong nonhistone protein binding sites throughout the genome. We investigated whether these checkpoint proteins acted either antagonistically or synergistically with Rrm3 in mediating other important functions such as maintenance of genome stability. High retromobility of a normally quiescent retrovirus-like transposable element Ty1 of S. cerevisiae is a form of genome instability, because the transposition events induce mutations. We measured the transposition of Ty1 in various genetic backgrounds and discovered that Tof1 suppressed excessive retromobility in collaboration with either Rrm3 or the F-box protein Dia2. Although both Rrm3 and Dia2 are believed to facilitate fork movement, fork stalling at DNA-protein complexes did not appear to be a major contributor to enhancement of retromobility. Absence of the aforementioned proteins either individually or in pair-wise combinations caused karyotype changes as revealed by the altered migrations of the individual chromosomes in pulsed field gels. The mobility changes were RNase H-resistant and therefore, unlikely to have been caused by extensive R loop formation. These mutations also resulted in alterations of telomere lengths. However, the latter changes could not fully account for the magnitude of the observed karyotypic alterations. We conclude that unlike other checkpoint proteins that are known to be required for elevated retromobility, Tof1 suppressed high frequency retrotransposition and maintained karyotype stability in collaboration with the aforementioned proteins.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA HelicasesDNA, RibosomalF-Box ProteinsGenome, FungalGenomic InstabilityRetroelementsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS PhaseDia2 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA HelicasesDNA, RibosomalF-Box ProteinsRetroelementsRrm3 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTOF1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID21087929
PMCPMC3024738
OpenAlexW2019397554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.