Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21087076›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology2010

Topoisomerases and site-specific recombinases: similarities in structure and mechanism.

Wei Yang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Archaeal tyrosine recombinases.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Serine Resolvases.Microbiology spectrum · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. An algebraic view of bacterial genome evolution.Journal of mathematical biology · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Bullied no more: when and how DNA shoves proteins around.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei YangLaboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. wei.yang@nih.gov
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Structural and mechanistic studies of V(D)J recombinationZIADK036147 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI YANG, WEI · 2009 to 2025
$6.6M
Structural and mechanistic studies of Holliday junction resolvaseZ01DK036145 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI YANG, WEI · 2007 to 2008
$538k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK036145Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK036147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processes of DNA topoisomerization and site-specific recombination are fundamentally similar: DNA cleavage by forming a phospho-protein covalent linkage, DNA topological rearrangement, and DNA ligation coupled with protein regeneration. Type IB DNA topoisomerases are structurally and mechanistically homologous to tyrosine recombinases. Both enzymes nick DNA double helices independent of metal ions, form 3'-phosphotyrosine intermediates, and rearrange the free 5' ends relative to the uncut strands by swiveling. In contrast, serine recombinases generate 5'-phospho-serine intermediates. A 180° relative rotation of the two halves of a 100 kDa terameric serine recombinase and DNA complex has been proposed as the mechanism of strand exchange. Here I propose an alternative mechanism. Interestingly, the catalytic domain of serine recombinases has structural similarity to the TOPRIM domain, conserved among all Type IA and Type II topoisomerases and responsible for metal binding and DNA cleavage. TOPRIM topoisomerases also cleave DNA to generate 5'-phosphate and 3'-OH groups. Based on the existing biochemical data and crystal structures of topoisomerase II and serine recombinases bound to pre- and post-cleavage DNA, I suggest a strand passage mechanism for DNA recombination by serine recombinases. This mechanism is reminiscent of DNA topoisomerization and does not require subunit rotation.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBinding SitesCatalytic DomainConserved SequenceDNADNA CleavageDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDNA TopoisomerasesGene ExpressionProtein ConformationSerineTyrosineDNADNA NucleotidyltransferasesDNA TopoisomerasesSerineSite-specific recombinaseTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID21087076
PMCPMC6290911
OpenAlexW1987405076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.